Swingular

Stoney Fork Swingers in Kentucky

Stoney Fork Swingers

If you are looking for Swingers in Stoney Fork, KY, then Swingular is the place for you. We have hundreds of thousands of swingers all over Stoney Fork looking to meet new people. Here is a list of 16 random Swingers within 100 miles of Stoney Fork, KY. To see more or to contact these members, click here to create a free account.

Stoney Fork Threesomes Stoney Fork Menage A Trois Stoney Fork Group Sex Stoney Fork Foursomes Stoney Fork Bi-Female Stoney Fork BBW Stoney Fork Gang Bang Stoney Fork MMF Stoney Fork MFM Stoney Fork Personals Stoney Fork Ads Stoney Fork Photos Stoney Fork Girl on Girl Stoney Fork Nudists Stoney Fork Exhibitionists Stoney Fork Voyeurs Stoney Fork Exhibitionists Stoney Fork Voyeurs

Stoney Fork, Kentucky Swingers can be found on Swingular. It's easy to find others using our advanced search technology. We base our search by zipcode so you will see how far each member is away from you by miles. You can search locally or you can search by state or zipcode as well. We have thousands of members from Stoney Fork, Kentucky so you have a very good chance that you will meet someone to your liking. We also have a booty call feature so you can post a booty call for quick response. Create your free account today and begin hooking up with Stoney Fork Swingers right away!

Sex vs. Guilt - Atheists have 'better sex lives than followers of religion who are plagued with guilt' - Guess I'm a Son of Perdition (pretty tame compared to other things I've been called). Coming soon to a theater near you. "The Sons of Perdition meet The Sons of Anarchy". We should totally start a drive thru excommunication business for LDS swingers. Think of the time it would save. Not to mention denying the "Elders" the disgusting details to which I'm certain more than one has gone home and jerked it to later. :-)

Monogamish - - Seems like a day doesn't go by without a new article on the high failure rate of traditional monogamous relationships and the "new" trend toward open relationships. Are swingers ahead of the curve or is this all just new age hooey? [url=https://www.yahoo.com/health/should-we-all-be-in-monogamish-relationships-109895587302.html]Monogamish[/url]

Evil's latest poll. Fellas, would you ever... - - [quote=POUNDCAKE]ditto that. I would sooner lick diamonds out of a tigers ass.[/quote] Yeah? Hmmmm I'm as hetero as the next guy but I think dick would HAVE to taste better than tiger shit. But then I don't really like poop in my mouth. And for KRAZYGIRL...yeah chicks do it for me too...and guys don't. Just kinda tryin' to make a point about how silly it is for some of us to be so afraid of another guy's dick when as swingers we're supposedly sexual libertines. I actually posted this as a poll on another older and much bigger swing site. The responses (all anonymous...hint, hint Swingular!) have been extremely interesting.

What does Bi comfy mean for a guy? - I wish Swingular had some definitions? - I have listed myself as straight because I am heterosexual. I kind of assumed that bi-curious means you are thinking about trying bisexuality for yourself but have not yet done so and that is not me. I kind of assumed that bi-comfortable means you are comfortable with some bisexual interaction that involves you personally being sexual, to some degree, with another man and I really am not. I am not homophobic or bi-phobic. If bi-comfortable means I have no problem with bi-sexuality or bi-sexual people then I am bi-comfortable. I would also be heterosexual comfortable, homosexual comfortable and transgender comfortable. We really do not have a problem with the male or the female half of a lifestyle couple being bi-sexual. My wife being bi-sexual, if she is attracted to both halves of just such a couple could enjoy having sex with both halves of the couple. We have been there and done that. I would only want to have sex with the women in the room but if the other man is bi-sexual and understands I will not be having sex with him then it is just the same as if he were heterosexual. No means no and yes means yes and in a room full of swingers it would seem the bi-sexual people have a better chance of getting a yes. If you focus on the pleasure you will not be having when there is no you cannot fully enjoy the pleasure you will and are having when you get a yes.

The Forum - For What It's Worth - [quote=FREERIDESTL] LTFOL...WTF are you talking about? LOL [/quote] guess you ain't been here long then: http://www.swingular.com/swingers/i/5254/ so whatever did happen to GSC and their tantrum?

Men, oh men, where are your pics... - - Sooo agree with this!!!! We hate when we see a nice looking female, then nothing of him. As much as my wife loves me, she is never going to play with a couple until she gets to see what she can play with too so it is not an "unpleasant surprise" like the one time we rolled the dice...lol . We don't even contact anyone anymore unless we see both. We have tons of face pics in the private album, almost to the point where someone asked if we were "really" swingers because that is all there was, Now we have body parts in there too,:) Women, be proud of your man and show him off!!!!!

A letter to Single Men looking to meet a willing Single Woman - - [quote=STANSBURYCPL]OK single peoples I could use some advise. My ex and I divorced 3 months ago. We were active swingers and that did not have anything to do with the divorce. We are still best friends and hang out all the time just live separate places and are following our different paths in life which was one of the things that led us to our divorce. Now upon divorce we talked about our Swingular profile and swinging in general. We love it and want to continue to attend parties together and be each others "wingman" per say. I have clearly outlined this on our profile in our description. Now to where I need advise. Now as a single man I would like to also find a single lady to have some fun with as well. I messaged and emailed and well to say the least the majority think I'm lying and trying to cheat, or wont talk with me because I do not have a profile picture. I explain that I cant post a public picture as it could cost me my job if the wrong person were to see it, but I'm happy to email one if requested. Now several months later I have not received one invite, one friend request, its radio silence. I would like to change this but I don't know how. Its led me to feelings of maybe I'm just not attractive enough sob story sob story bla no one wants to hear that crap, but I'm super frustrated. Any advise would be welcome. Thanks in advance. Aaron [/quote] This might sound simplistic, but I have been approached by government agents, school principals, Fortune 500 CEO's and CFO's that are unable to provide a face picture but will email one as you mentioned. Why can't you put your face picture in your private pictures. The only people that would see it is the ones you granted access to? I am given some reasons for this from them, but most stem because of government conspiracy theories. Hoping that is not you. If you can be fooled granting access you can also be fooled sending your picture by email. I don't want to give out my email to single men or newly single men with or with out a wing woman. Assuming you are verified and I haven't checked that, but this would also insure the person you are communicating with that the picture is indeed you. Just a thought.

Swingers ski trip to Colorado - - Hi, we are going on a Swingers ski trip to Colorado Feb. 4th-9th. We are looking for a couple or couples to go with us because it's much cheaper that way. It comes to $900 per couple for 5 nights at 1 bedroom apartment, lift tickets for 3 days of skiing, Airport round trip transfer. (Skis rent extra around $100 per person if you don't have your own). To take virtual resort tour go here http://tours.360house.com/Viewer_pr.cfm?ID=71455 Look for one bedroom or Colorado suite. Looks like very good resort. Here you can find more info on the trip http://www.astraveloffl.com/ We have been looking to go to Colorado for a while and can tell you that's a very good price. Only transfer from Denver airport cost $200 round trip per person, 3 days lift tickets cost $200 if you buy it on line in advance and over $250 at the door. So, price worth it. Plus, skiing such a fun and Colorado is the only place in U.S. that comparable to famous european ski trails. If you are a couple and want to go with us lets talk about it. Please, be under 40. We prefer local to us couples so, we can meet and see if we all can live together in one apartment for five nights. :)

"Hall Pass" the movie - Funny as hell! - The first of it was great...ending was predictable....but over all good!! worth seeing! they should just become swingers and everything would be perfect!

Important ! Please read this post. - - [quote]You know, I read the sign on my way in here that said "Don't feed the trolls!", but I'm bored and this looks like a fun way to kill a few minutes. So, let's get started shall we?[/quote] Ahhhhhhhhhhh another guy who [b]THINKS[/b] he knows something, but later on proves that he doesn't.... [quote]We all participate in risky behavior, huh? I suppose that depends on your definition of "risky". If you really want to be pedantic, every time you draw breath you're taking a risk. You take an even bigger risk should you choose to not draw breath. [/quote] I am sorry, thought this was a swinger site... I guess you have a study that's not from the 1990's that shows that over 50% of people engage in swinging, right? Nope, you don't, therefore we engage in risky behavior! [quote]Typically when one uses the term "risky behavior" they're implicitly saying "behavior that is risky beyond the risk of normal behavior". Having sex with your spouse, regardless of whether they're cheating or not, is not risky behavior. [/quote] Regardless if they're cheating? Really? What, praytell, are you doing here, I guess you've solved the world's STD's crisis, right? Found a shot that cures herpes and HIV? Then how is it [b]NOT[/b] risky if they are cheating? [quote]Uhm... Did I miss something? What exactly are you saying "BULLSHIT!" to? It seems fairly clear that you're both stating the same sentiment.. are you calling bullshit on the fact that he bothered replying?[/quote] AHHHHHHH....Failed reading comprehension, did we? Let's have a look at what they said... What you UNDERLINED is the key.... WITHOUT complete absinence............ Without abstinence, you're engaging in risky behavior! Now, one could say, 'I use condoms, dental damns, and ALWAYS practice safe sex!' Is that enough? Let's see, ever been with a squirter? Ever had a woman get so worked up that her juices are squishing around on your balls? I guess that's not enough to catch something, right? Dr. Darcone, me thinks you need to rethink your ideas. [quote]Are you actively going about doing cultures of these things, just looking for a place disease can be communicated from?[/quote] I don't have to, I pay taxes so I don't. [quote]I don't know about the rest of you, but if there's a wet towel at the gym, and it's not mine, I'm not touching it. Soap Dishes? You know, I've always wondered at the point of anti-microbial soap..[/quote] Have you ever heard the saying, 'It is better to remain silent and thought of as a fool than to open your mouth to remove all doubt?' This would apply for you. Wet towels look like dry ones, yours is next to theirs, and you've NEVER accidentally grabbed someone else's? A little nick on your hand, BINGO! Anti-Microbial soap ONLY works if left in place for 30 seconds or more. Now, you place your soap on the tray, anyplace that the soap touches, in 30 seconds, would be 99.9% free of microbes, HOWEVER, anywhere it doesn't touch isn't. But you wouldn't touch the soap tray with your fingers, then touch your eyes, nose or mouth, right? [quote]And before you knock wikipedia, it's been verified to be more accurate than any other available encyclopedia. So, while influenza and bronchitis may be transmitted sexually, they aren't STI's. If you get herpaghonasyphaclap from kissing some random corpse, then it is not sexually transmitted by definition. By the same token, an oral infection of HSV-1 is -not- an STI. It becomes an STI once it infects the sacral ganglia. Also worth noting is that neither the CDC nor WHO acknowledge HSV-1 as being an STI.[/quote] Chlamydia is the most common form of STD, it IS passed from casual and accidental contact, Herpes IS an STD, it also is passed from incidental contact. So, your entire premise if wrong. [quote]For the actual statistics on extramarital affairs, see: This Study published by Oxford (22-25% of men, 11-15% of women). (fwiw, that article is a fantastic meta-analysis of a broad range of studies)[/quote] Actually from a Colorado college, not Oxford. Oxford may be where you found it, but your reading comprehension is, once again, coming into question. The first sentence of your report states its from Colorado. The last time I checked, Oxford is not in Colorado. Additionally, the study is from over 10 years ago, nothing has changed since then, right? The internet hasn't become more prevalent? Easy access to willing sex partners hasn't added to the instances of EMI? Nah, nothing to see here. Perhaps one should look at a more priminent site for these things? Perhaps one should look at the sample size to determine statistical significance? Perhaps one should see who was 'randomly' selected to participate? [quote]Jim, do you actually have a point you're trying to espouse here? Are you just trying to say that sex isn't safe? I'm pretty sure we were all aware of that fact.[/quote] As a matter of fact I do, that point is: GROW THE FUCK UP! We're all taking risks, don't cry about the results of your risk taking. Would you allow someone who suddenly decided to try skydiving, had no training, packed their own chute, then jumped and was injured to complain about how they were injured? Of course not, but since it is someone who was TOTALLY aware of the risks involved and they're participating in KNOWN risky behavior its OK because you're participating in it also? [quote]Or are you trying to say "Who needs protection? Sex is dangerous no matter what!"? If that's what you're trying to say, you have much to learn on the difference between risk and certainty.[/quote] Not at all.... I am saying, we're all aware of the risks, we don't need to read their alligator tears because they rolled the dice and came up snake eyes. [quote]There are a plethora of things one can do to reduce the risk of contracting -any- STI. There's no certainty that you'll ever be completely safe from contracting one. There's also no certainty that you'll ever contract one.[/quote] For once, we can agree on something. [quote]One strong way you can reduce those risks is by clearly communicating what infections you're at risk of spreading. That's the purpose of this thread, and along with most everyone else, I'd like to thank the ABC's for their post.[/quote] Showing up at a swingers' party, club, or site is pretty clearly communicating that we're at risk of ANY sexually transmitted desease.

© Copyright 2001–2019 Swingular, an SB Entertainment Company.