If you are looking for Swingers in
Virginia, then Swingular is the place for you. We have
hundreds of thousands of swingers all over
Virginia looking to meet new people. Choose a city for a list of
Virginia Swingers in your area. If you do not see your city, choose
the closest city to you as it will show you swingers within
100 miles of the city in you
Virginia selected.
Virginia Swingers
Swingers now officially a high risk group for STDs and STIs -
Do your own research -
[quote=KINKYPANTZ][quote=DELICIOUSLYWET]We have done our own research and we have come to the conclusion that......
Swingers are now officially considered a High Risk group for STDS and STIs just like gay men and intravenous drug users.
Google it, call the governmental entities that research the statistics. Ask your doctor and decide for yourself. Do your own research. I was initially going to site a number of research studies but I think it has more impact if you do your own research.
Get tested and go through a quarantine period and then get tested again. We did and we now know we test clean of everything including the cold sore virus. We were lucky hell we are lucky and we have decided luck is not enough. We have re-defined in very certain terms what we will and what we won't do and who we will and who we won't consider full swap sex with.
Decide for yourself but do the research and get tested. [/quote]
I didn't find an article when I googled your topic, more recent than 2010. Also the bit about swingers being in a high risk category specifically notes an average age of 45+ and of course I'm not saying that isn't applicable to some here, but come on! No wonder you didn't include links to your research...
I will tell you what makes me want to be monogamous, maybe even celibate - reading these forums! -Mrs. Kinky[/quote]
Looks like you have been reading and you did run across the Dutch research study. 2010 and 2009 here at home are in many cases the most recent data depending on what you are looking for and where you are looking. Compare those statistics with earlier studies and you get an idea of increases in risk. Data analysis is far more tedious and boring than the forums post I offer on this subject. It was not so simple for us as to just read a few articles. It is possible that the risk has gone down. I sincerely, hope that is true and we are overestimating the risk. Perhaps more people are self identifying as swingers and so more people with positive test are being included in the data as swingers. What I do not see is any real attempt at systematic education or intervention. Nothing that would suggest a reason for improvement within the community.
If swingers do not, as a group, come out of the closet as far as their healthcare providers and organizations that monitor such things like the CDC are concerned and allow for data compilation sufficient for real numbers analysis we may never really know what we are or not dealing with. It is evident that the number of people in the swinging lifestyle using technology to at least try and hook up is far greater than the numbers self identifying as swingers in clinical observation and testing. Maybe the percentages of people getting tested right here in Utah that self identify as swingers that are testing positive is much higher than the percentage within the broader swingers community that are positive?
Technology makes hooking up so much easier and it make for lack of a better term marketing the potential rewards within the lifestyle experience so much more available as well. Should technology not afford an opportunity or a forum, for the consideration of potential solutions to a problem we all recognize exist to some degree? Lets say I am an alarmist. Would not most of you like to know the real story? Well, really knowing the real story is only possible if the whole community gets tested. Knowing your own personal STD story is only possible through testing as well.
Is it perhaps possible that education and full battery testing just might be made more affordable and convenient and still remain anonymous if the community was willing to seek it out? As far as infectious disease is concern the CDC is really not judgmental. No community is an island and all communities have some effect on all the rest.
swingers helper... -
I know some of us need this every now and again... -
OMG!!!! LMAO!!!!
That just made my day :D
Creating an Amazing Swingers Profile -
How to market yourself better -
I think my advice above boils down to:
1) Be honest.. Don't try to mislead people about who or what you are.
2) Make an effort to give others a chance to get to know you and trust you.
3) Don't be gross.
And this stuff is nothing more than my opinion.. While I would love a world where everyone is required to agree with me, that probably won't happen for at least 5 more years, if things continue to go well. ;)
Hollywood Swingers? -
-
I heard peewee is a swinger lol
Bucket list -
-
[quote=swingsetacrobat4439][quote=PARTYINLV]Ours is to pick up a vanilla couple in a vanilla setting and convert them to the lifestyle with us being their first experience.[/quote]
Check. We don't know if we converted them, but we are confident that we are their most interesting vacation story. 😉[/quote]
We LOVE to pretend that we're vanilla and let people who are obvious swingers pick us up and "seduce" us (This is especially easy to do in Vegas for some reason.). It's really quite fun. Only once did we let the cat out of the bag and told them afterwards that we're actually seasoned swingers. They got quite pissed. [em]Emo_49[/em]
Close minded swinger "Open" Lifestyle...... -
-
Posted By: ULUVBIGBLKDICK Posted on:
Jan 19, 2006 - 8:36 am
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Whites only swingers?? Death to all single males?? and now NO NAKED MEN ON CAM CHAT?? (only if your married and single females which is encouraged)
How close minded is this swingers world becoming or has it been this way all along??
Your thoughts.
AND YOU CALL US RACIST I THINK YOU ARE A BIG ONE
I THINK THERE ARE ONLY SO MANY CAM WINDOWS THAT YOU CAN CAM ON
HERE.I tried to get on cam one day and there where like 6 guys on and the rest where
couples on not one offer to give it up.
i think its called swingers NOT swinger
Kristylynn
Swingers gone bad?? -
-
Just a thought here...
Compare this to another post about women being drugged at parties...
In both situations you are giving another human being a substance to reduce or remove any ability to say no to unwanted sexual advances.
Rape is rape no matter if it is an adult/adult rape or adult/child rape. And if someone is too drunk/high/drugged to consent and the person continues, it's rape.
To those thinking it's kind of cool, wrong. For an adult who is by their age, in a position of power to abuse that power and sexually assault another is not cool.
It's illegal, it's immoral and it's flat out disgusting.
swingtown -
a new show on cbs -
we liked it and record it on DVR. It all looks pretty much "period" for the times. My only thought is: I wonder how many people will watch that and think they can be swingers?
Swingers now officially a high risk group for STDs and STIs -
Do your own research -
Perhaps more accurately, you were "STD (actually STI is a more current and descriptive term) free" at that moment you were tested (many STI's have various incubation periods before they are seriologically detectable-HIV can take up to 6 months). Additionally many STI's (most strains of HPV) there is currently no test for. So you are STI free for only those STI's that were tested for in your panel. There are MANY intections that can be spread sexually that one wouldn't normally consider an STD. Sorry, don't mean to shit in your Cheerios but far too many of us have a severe case of cognitive dissonance when it comes to STI's in the lifestyle. Swinging (and life, as pointed out by CHETDO) is a risk. You can minimize the risk somewhat by adopting certain protocols and behaviors but never decrease it to zero as long as you continue to swing. If you swing you must accept that you are engaging in risky behavior and be okay with that. We've been around the scene actively and inactivley for a long time and have seen and heard it all as far as those who would delude themselves that taking any of the above actions (other than monogamy) would make them safe from STI's. The sad truth is that MOST of us (if not all) have been exposed to and likely carry some form of STI already. If this were not the case they would offer Gardisil to adults. So that horse has likely already left the barn, so to speak. It's a little like riding a motorcycle. If you don't want to be involved in a motorcycle accident, don't ride. If you don't want an STI don't swing. Helmets (condoms) can help but some asshole can still run over you. [em]Emo_67[/em]
Sex vs. Guilt -
Atheists have 'better sex lives than followers of religion who are plagued with guilt' -
Guess I'm a Son of Perdition (pretty tame compared to other things I've been called). Coming soon to a theater near you. "The Sons of Perdition meet The Sons of Anarchy". We should totally start a drive thru excommunication business for LDS swingers. Think of the time it would save. Not to mention denying the "Elders" the disgusting details to which I'm certain more than one has gone home and jerked it to later. :-)
|