Davidsville Swingers in Pennsylvania

If you are looking for Swingers in Davidsville, PA, then Swingular is the place for you. We have hundreds of thousands of swingers all over Davidsville looking to meet new people. Here is a list of 16 random Swingers within 100 miles of Davidsville, PA. To see more or to contact these members, click here to create a free account.

Davidsville, Pennsylvania Swingers can be found on Swingular. It's easy to find others using our advanced search technology. We base our search by zipcode so you will see how far each member is away from you by miles. You can search locally or you can search by state or zipcode as well. We have thousands of members from Davidsville, Pennsylvania so you have a very good chance that you will meet someone to your liking. We also have a booty call feature so you can post a booty call for quick response. Create your free account today and begin hooking up with Davidsville Swingers right away!

LDS Swingers Survey - Will any former/active LDS swingers take my survey? - So far we have 54 responses. Pretty interesting so far. I was thinking I would post it while some of you are at church tomorrow. :)

If Sex Work Was Legal Everywhere - - Well if you're meaning if prostitution was legal everywhere. Don't think you would see very many single men on a swingers site since some of the husbands would charge them to help fuck there wives. An the experience would probably go back to the way it was back in the 60's and 70's of just couple swapping there wives. Poet

YOLO Cruise April 26 2009 - swingers cruise - Hi all U "cruzers" out there...!!! Are U ready to PARTY, we are... as usual. Looking forward to gettin with old friends & new "playmates"... we'll be at Caliente the weekend the ship leaves, so if your in the area, Saturday night is a "Bon Voyage" party at Caliente, Wanna Cum...!!! Hugz, Bob & Christa

Swingers cars??? - What ya driving?? - [quote=TNT4FUN2]A Yugo and 74 AMC Pacer.[/quote] Hey we got the same cars.

Las Vegas - Swingers clubs ect. - [quote=Utahldscouple][quote=Mrnmrsb]Can people who have been to both flirts and playhouselv explain the differences, pros and cons, and such? Been to playhouselv and loved it. Debating flirts. Any help would be great![/quote]Simple. Flirts allows byob and provides mixers, playhouse alcohol is prohibited. Second, playhouse filters and screens it applicants where flirts allows most anyone. Playhouse is in a commercial building and flirts is in a residential building (very well designed layout for sexy fun, e.g. the glass wall play rooms above the DJ). Playhouse allows single males and flirts is couples and single females only. That is about it. [/quote] Playhouselv allows single guys on Fridays only. Saturdays are couples and single females

Happy hairless people - Opinions please - [quote=FUCKCHASTITY][quote=356KINKY]Shaving is great, but waxing is the way to go. We only wax once a month and wouldn't do it any other way. [/quote] I have thought about waxing but my hair grows too fast. I have to shave everyday so if I waxed I think it would only stay away for a few days, making the price and pain not worth it. So i guess my question is, does your hair grow that fast too and waxing really does help keep it at bay for a month, or are you one of the lucky ones that grows hair slowly so a monthly wax works for you?[/quote] The waxing is much easier and it does stay smooth for about 6 weeks once you do it a couple of times and the more you do the less the pain and it is not realy that painful anyway. Brazillian is the way of the future just make sure if you are a guy you have a pro or you can get hurt. We live on the east coast and among swingers and nudist from TN to Florida I think the % is very high.

Do you only play with married couples? - - I'm going to add something that is taboo, the concept of a couple taking some time together as if to steal away from their partner where one or both are married and / or swingers. Isn't there some additional excitement to do so? Please know that I have considered very thoroughly that it is best to conduct behaviour while the significant other is aware, either same room or separately. So correct me (and I'm sure you will) if I am wrong but I think there is a situation now and then where a couple could steal away and have a good time if they are cool about it, married or single, yes?

Translating Personals/Swingers Ads - - ROFLMAO! Okay, now it all makes sense!

Reject Affair Match - Cheaters are not swingers - Riderz, You crack us up!

Obama's Roadtrip - - [quote]Fair enough. Then why rely on them for anything that likely wasn't adequately studied?[/quote] Likely just does not do it for me...When the numbers are given AND shown how they were gathered, I tend to believe they are fairly accurate. [quote]Let's take your Pepsi/Coke example. There is likely nothing befuddling about your scenario. Just one possibility: Where are the two Florida products bottled? Maybe it's the water.[/quote] Both bottled locally, it is chalked up to being a preferance thing. In WI, lived there for a while, it was called pop or soda, unless a VERY specific thing was needed, a Mountain Dew for instance. In the south, it is a Coke no matter what it is. If someone in the south offers a Coke, it could be Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Diet Rite, Sam's Club Soda, etc. [quote]I'm glad you agree with the logic. My Bachelor's is in Social Welfare (Psych Minor). Human nature is only a bitch of a thing when you get out there a few standard deviations. The bulk of us are as predictable as rats.[/quote] Believe it or not, I have 2 BA's (econ and int. rel.) with a minor in social work. So I am very aware of social science standards and SOME believe that we're predictable. If you have a smaller sample, we are fairly predictable, especially when the sample is taken from a specific group of people (swingers for instance, better yet, swingers in a specific region), once you get to the larger populations (nationwide for instance), human behavior is not easily quantified. Try being the ONLY conservative in all the social work classes, it was fun! Then again, opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. [quote]I propose that as an economist you are simply looking at things with a limited perspective. [/quote] Possibly, but I also have a rare ability to look at it from an outsider's view.... [quote]There is simply no question that if a person's basic needs (food and shelter) are met, there is less motivation to risk the consequences of violating societal rules.[/quote] I can see the logic of this, however, we are Americans, we always want MORE, we are constantly bombarded with images of MORE, we are constantly told that without MORE we are incomplete, etc. What are the consequences of violating societal rules? Food, shelter, clothing, TV, etc? Really tough there. Look at prisons in Mexico, if your family does not provide, you starve, more than likely. THAT is consequences, it is a deterrant (sp?). IMHO, one of the reasons for our increased crime rates is the lack of public punishment. If every time you turned around, you saw a group of people in black and white stripes mowing lawns, trimming trees, etc. on the side of the road in leg chains, it would cut crime considerably. If they did public executions, it would cut crime dramatically. Then again, I am a staunch supporter of heavy penalties for crimes, especially when they are repeat offenders, most of the social scientists are not. They want more rehab and such, which I also support, BUT only for first timers, not for repeat offenders. Anyway, I am thoroughly enjoying our debate... Next!