Alpine Swingers in New_jersey

If you are looking for Swingers in Alpine, NJ, then Swingular is the place for you. We have hundreds of thousands of swingers all over Alpine looking to meet new people. Here is a list of 16 random Swingers within 100 miles of Alpine, NJ. To see more or to contact these members, click here to create a free account.

Alpine, New_jersey Swingers can be found on Swingular. It's easy to find others using our advanced search technology. We base our search by zipcode so you will see how far each member is away from you by miles. You can search locally or you can search by state or zipcode as well. We have thousands of members from Alpine, New_jersey so you have a very good chance that you will meet someone to your liking. We also have a booty call feature so you can post a booty call for quick response. Create your free account today and begin hooking up with Alpine Swingers right away!

Las Vegas - Las Vegas - [quote=BMSHELL]We haven't been, but do have a weekend planned the first of May... Did extensive research on Red Rooster and Green Door... and they both look gross. Really gross. (Like, worn down, 70s style venue where you could probably get an STD from sitting on a chair). Wife saw the pictures, read the reviews, and refuses to go anywhere near them. Swingers Circle looks more like a scam to me than a swingers club -- and after reading the reviews, I'm kind of disappointed that Swingular even allows them to advertise here. Couples Oasis and New Temptations are the two we intend to investigate when we arrive... but honestly, they're our backup plan if we can't find a fun couple to hit it off with, instead.[/quote]We were at the Red Rooster this past Saturday Night and had a wonderful time, if we play we always have our own sheets and towels, we have also attended a Swingers Circle event had a WONDERFUL time there also, Couples Oasis, was nice, but we aren't Ken & Barbie either, so i guess it all depends on who and what you are really looking for. Good Luck

BD/SM- Why are there no groups? - - I'm fairly certain there are at least a couple of BDSM groups here. Have you tried searching in groups? Not sure why you think those interested in this type of play would necessarily want to keep it private. These days (especially with the whole "Fifty Shades" phenomena) it's practically main stream. But yes there are outside groups...many call it the "Kink Community" who pretty much do this type of play exclusively and aren't necessarily swingers. In all actuality swinging is becoming fairly watered down these days with all the different groups (I'm thinking of polys as well as many other fetishes and play styles) wanting to be included under the big umbrella of swinging. It's a wonder anyone really ends up hooking up these days. LOL

Face pics - Just a statement - [quote=TRAVELING_GUY69]Just my 2 cents' worth..... On one hand, I completely understand people wanting to be anonymous or protect their identity. At the same time, we're all here for essentially the same reason! Is someone from this site really going to "out" another publicly? Maybe I'm just being too simple, but I hope someone in public recognizes me from this site! What a great way to break the ice-"I saw your ad on Swingular...."[/quote] Exactly...what are they gonna say to out you? "Ooooo I saw they have a profile on a swingers site!" Oh yeah? What the hell were you doing on a swingers site?? Can't really out you without outting themselves ;) Blueeyes...didn't u say one time that you had ended up accecpting a friend request from a relative because neither of you had face pics? Aaaaaawkward :P lol

Member Since - How long have you been on? - Swingers since 2006 swingular since sept 2007....The Tarts:p

Damn Utah couples! :) - - SWINGING8869, I agree some mormon peeps are cool. I just don't like the Church's agenda. In order for it to be carried out, it requires people. So, there are plenty of shithead zealots out there. LOL! On the swing side of the house, It doesn't even apply, because you can't be both a swinger and a active member of the church. I was only referring to those that are actual members of the church and actively seek to make all people comply with their dogma through unconstitutional legislation. Like the people that water down beer, disallow gambling penetration porn and stem cell research etc. I wasn't referring to any the swingers here. :-) Kinbaku, I am sure there were some horny bastards before the Greeks LOL. -D-

Trying new things . . . - Is it worth it? - We have met some great friends off swingular and AFF. The Key word is "meet". Meeting DOESN'T mean sleeping with..We have those that we play with and those that we don't. The great thing about having swingers as friends..You don't have to be all hush hush about sex.

MARDI GRAS - is it to soon? - the sign left out swingers........

Swingers of Color - - Yes I believe DNDNMIA have the right attitude.... Get to it... lolol

New Meet and Mingle Party House - Is there interest in the northern counties? - Hi 🙋🏽‍♂️ We’re putting out the feelers for interest in a new meet and mingle party house located in Weber county. This will be a selective group of COUPLES ONLY that we would like to put together... if it goes well we would have regular meet and mingles moving forward. This is an option we’d like to have in the northern counties without having to go to a club and advertise to the public that it’s a “swingers” hangout. Couples from farther counties are welcome. We’d like to keep things more discreet and selective in the people that attend, and hopefully make a good group of LS friends in the process. There would be a screening process. We’ll need to know who is coming (face pics) so there are no coworkers showing up at our door that have already seen our nekkid pics on Swingular. That would be a sexual harassment HR nightmare 😂 You can private message with questions, or reply to this thread if you’re interested. Again, if you’re gun shy about providing face pics, this party isn’t for you. We’ll keep an RSVP list of people attending and provide it to the others that have RSVPd, so they can see who they’ll be mingling with. We will not provide face pics to other couples. Just the usernames. Thanks for reading, and happy adventures to all you sexy people 🙂

Obama's Roadtrip - - [quote]Fair enough. Then why rely on them for anything that likely wasn't adequately studied?[/quote] Likely just does not do it for me...When the numbers are given AND shown how they were gathered, I tend to believe they are fairly accurate. [quote]Let's take your Pepsi/Coke example. There is likely nothing befuddling about your scenario. Just one possibility: Where are the two Florida products bottled? Maybe it's the water.[/quote] Both bottled locally, it is chalked up to being a preferance thing. In WI, lived there for a while, it was called pop or soda, unless a VERY specific thing was needed, a Mountain Dew for instance. In the south, it is a Coke no matter what it is. If someone in the south offers a Coke, it could be Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Diet Rite, Sam's Club Soda, etc. [quote]I'm glad you agree with the logic. My Bachelor's is in Social Welfare (Psych Minor). Human nature is only a bitch of a thing when you get out there a few standard deviations. The bulk of us are as predictable as rats.[/quote] Believe it or not, I have 2 BA's (econ and int. rel.) with a minor in social work. So I am very aware of social science standards and SOME believe that we're predictable. If you have a smaller sample, we are fairly predictable, especially when the sample is taken from a specific group of people (swingers for instance, better yet, swingers in a specific region), once you get to the larger populations (nationwide for instance), human behavior is not easily quantified. Try being the ONLY conservative in all the social work classes, it was fun! Then again, opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. [quote]I propose that as an economist you are simply looking at things with a limited perspective. [/quote] Possibly, but I also have a rare ability to look at it from an outsider's view.... [quote]There is simply no question that if a person's basic needs (food and shelter) are met, there is less motivation to risk the consequences of violating societal rules.[/quote] I can see the logic of this, however, we are Americans, we always want MORE, we are constantly bombarded with images of MORE, we are constantly told that without MORE we are incomplete, etc. What are the consequences of violating societal rules? Food, shelter, clothing, TV, etc? Really tough there. Look at prisons in Mexico, if your family does not provide, you starve, more than likely. THAT is consequences, it is a deterrant (sp?). IMHO, one of the reasons for our increased crime rates is the lack of public punishment. If every time you turned around, you saw a group of people in black and white stripes mowing lawns, trimming trees, etc. on the side of the road in leg chains, it would cut crime considerably. If they did public executions, it would cut crime dramatically. Then again, I am a staunch supporter of heavy penalties for crimes, especially when they are repeat offenders, most of the social scientists are not. They want more rehab and such, which I also support, BUT only for first timers, not for repeat offenders. Anyway, I am thoroughly enjoying our debate... Next!