Blue Lake Swingers in California

If you are looking for Swingers in Blue Lake, CA, then Swingular is the place for you. We have hundreds of thousands of swingers all over Blue Lake looking to meet new people. Here is a list of 16 random Swingers within 100 miles of Blue Lake, CA. To see more or to contact these members, click here to create a free account.

Blue Lake, California Swingers can be found on Swingular. It's easy to find others using our advanced search technology. We base our search by zipcode so you will see how far each member is away from you by miles. You can search locally or you can search by state or zipcode as well. We have thousands of members from Blue Lake, California so you have a very good chance that you will meet someone to your liking. We also have a booty call feature so you can post a booty call for quick response. Create your free account today and begin hooking up with Blue Lake Swingers right away!

Swingers in Draper cause Super Dell to speed - - LOL - Good One! That explains everything! We knew that there was a reason he was driving like such a maniac! Very Funny Thanks for the laugh! Where do we get those concealed swinger permits? And we are still trying to find the recuiting office! lol ;) kisses

Swinger Friendly Businesses - Business or services friendly to swingers - I own a residential painting company, so if anybody needs Quality Service at a Fair Price, let me know. We have done work for our friends on Swingular, so our references are easy to check out.

real members? - - I have to disagree with you on your valadation process.. the ONLY thing that your photo or cam session proves is that it is a real person NOT a real swinger. In order for someone to prove that they are a REAL swinger.... There has to be some kind of reference referral from other swingers. Holding up a sign does NOT provide if they are swingers or not!!! BTW.... the couple that started this forum topic are REAL!!! We have never played with them but we have seen them at several parties. They are as real as they come. :) Carrie

SENDING EMAIL VIA CELL PHONE APP.. - - [quote=LILMISSRIDINGHOOD][quote=MATTANDLIZFORFUN][quote=LILMISSRIDINGHOOD][quote=MATTANDLIZFORFUN]Is it just us, or is half the site suddenly missing?[/quote] Half the site is missing. On the bright side. You only have half the stuff to focus on. :) [/quote] But we're swingers, more is almost always better[/quote] I get ya. Maybe we could begin a game of who can post the naughtiest picture in the forums until it comes back up. You first.[/quote]\ Oooh, fun game! I'll start. [img]https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-85c0c545b8f56e87204062d8f7e1c909?convert_to_webp=true[/img] [img]http://img.wennermedia.com/620-width/donald-trump-ivanka-trump-hug-105b10eb-16d2-4086-9564-83856240f11c.gif[/img]

Christain Swingers? - - We got up and looked back at this thread today and we have to say we agree that this is a great group of people here. Man, with everyone expressing thier thoughts on this (Including our minority opinion) and not having a flame war or having things get personal is a very cool thing. We are impressed !! We still will not touch the politics though! Art and Dawn:D

Swingers In Uniform - Pay your memorial day respects here. - Don & Tami aka SGT and SPC Cole, We'll go in order here with the few things we have to say. 1. As an active duty career military family, our hearts go out to our fallen brothers/sisters and their families. 2. Your response could not have been worded any better. Kudos! 3. As for the Don Juan issue, this might take a minute. I've read a lot here about "protecting his rights to speak his opinion" and the like. I agree to an extent, but this dude rides so far out on the left wing that we might just be able to label him as a "domestic enemy." Myself and many other members of this site are sworn to protect this country from the like. I propose that Don Juan reveal his true identity and we deal with him accordingly. Not only for the shoving of his misguided opinions, but for using profanity in the direction of my wife in a forum and an email (yes, I remember and will not soon forget). V/R Chris & Dawn aka CW2 and the Mrs.

KSL swing story - - The story was terribley produced. Little to no research. As I said in the thread leading up to KSL being at the Club 90 party, they decided what story they were going to write before they even put pen to paper, and they were not going to let the truth get in the way of their story. I particularily liked the way it played women to be victims in the Lifestyle, especially when everyone knows it is women that really run the show and have the biggest say-so in who a couple plays with. Also, in surveys of swingers when asked "Who's idea was it to start swinging?" 34% of the time it was the wife that first brought it up. Sure, men still accounted for 54% of the survey (the rest couldn't remember who's idea it was originally), but it's not the men wanting sex with other women and drawing their poor defenseless wife into the lurid underground world of wife swapping to do it. Hell, anyone who's been around it for a while knows it's more "husband swapping" anyway. :p I've been following the comments on KSL's website, and these people have no life. They wait to watch the news every night and then add their two cents to every subject. None of them have any idea what they are talking about. As Ozzie Guillen says about arm chair coaches and sportscasters "the farther you sit from the plate the smarter you think you are." LMAO But all the comments are along the same lines, the evil cheating husband luring his innocent, unsuspecting wife into the seedy underworld. Then you get the fake profile they put up and within "six days, 70 married men, most from Utah, ask to start a fling." LMAO Damn, how many couples get emails every day from "free member" married men looking to cheat? We get at least one a day. The same old story over and over: Married Mormon family man who says "I love my wife but she doesn't like sex". These people need to look within themselves. We're not the problem, they are. Plus, most of us won't play with cheaters and after a time we've become very adept at sniffing them out. My wife gets at least one married Mormon man a day sending her an IM on her personal Yahoo! Messenger ID, and they find her in the Yahoo! directory (not Yahoo! Personals, the directory). They just go through looking for women online to contact. They don't know she is a swinger. Her Yahoo! profile is innocent as can be. If they are going to cheat they will find a way, with or without swingers. Wow... I'd love to say this on KSL's site, but like fun4usxx said, it will just add fuel to the fire and you can't win. You can't fix stupid. Mr. Caress4u

KEY PARTY - - We 'get' and actually applaud the effort to find some way to avoid the often typical cliquey swing party but still have to wonder how feasible it might be in practice. The problem, as we see it, is that swinging is an atypical social construct in that it is driven almost entirely by superficial factors such as relative attractiveness (age, height, weight, body type, breast size, cock size, and any number of other physical characteristics). When we first started swinging, back around the time Cleopatra was busy inventing hookup culture and the term unicorn, we quickly discovered that swinging wasn't the sexual egalitarian utopia that many people believe it should be. Indeed, there was actually a broad, distinct caste system, if you will, that governed who hooked up with who and who was relegated to the sidelines at least in certain circles or situations. This might be best illustrated by one of our very early encounters with two couples at a swinger meet and greet back east. One of the couples was loudly expounding on their utter disgust with the concept that people in the lifestyle seem to be so "stuck-up" (their term) and were too concerned about "looks" and other superficial characteristics. They went on and on for probably close to an hour before they, I guess, ran out of steam and decided to leave. After they were gone, the other couple at the table laughed a little bit and gave us some fairly sage advice. They told us that we would likely meet three general kinds of swingers in the lifestyle. They said that the first couple was the "Hey, you're swingers and we're swingers so let's fuck!" kind of people and that on the opposite end of the spectrum were the extremely picky, "beautiful people" who spent more time "watching the door" at a swing function always looking for the BBD (bigger, better, deal) and who more often than not left without actually hooking-up/playing. They said that the relatively smaller group in between those two extremes were those who had a little more realistic attitude and who were, while still giving a good amount of weight to initial physical attraction, actually looking a little more FOR reasons to play rather than for reasons NOT to play. They told us to decide for ourselves what kind of swingers we wanted to be and go from there but to never fuck someone that we really didn't want to fuck. *shrug* As to your idea of making it more of a "speed swinging" type of party, I'm almost certain that there are at least a few people here on Swingular who have talked about, if not hosted, just such a party. It might be interesting if they or any of their guests chimed in as to how it turned out.

Girls that are into DP - How common is this activity among the swingers? - [quote=SFWHYNOT][quote=HOTTIEHOGANS]I LOVE dp :) love love love. I would like to try dvp too. but we don't do single guys and finding girls that want to do it/allow their hubby's to do it is difficult. :([/quote] Is single out because of the worry about attachment? What about a married guy playing alone?[/quote] No Its out because he feels left or when there isn't another girl for him.to play with. I disagree with it but it makes him uncomfortable so I don't push it.

Weeding through the real/ fakes - I wish there was a "validation " on profiles.. - PolyCouple, I think you're pointing to a cultural gap that we've also been frustrated with for years. We fall more into the independently open category, which puts us closer to the poly-lite and kink communities than the swinger community. We've found that a lot of swingers have the men negotiate the process and that's a huge turn off for us so we end up considering it a red flag in terms of what we're looking for. No judgement, it just clearly wouldn't work with our dynamic. We're free to talk to and do whatever we want with whomever we want. And we do. It's just different. But, in general, only hearing from the man does also make it hard to figure out if you're talking to a real couple or if there's true enthusiastic consent involved on all sides. Especially with so much catfishing going on over on other apps. Maybe the site could have badges or tags that filter searches.