Centerfield Swingers in Utah

If you are looking for Swingers in Centerfield, UT, then Swingular is the place for you. We have hundreds of thousands of swingers all over Centerfield looking to meet new people. Here is a list of 16 random Swingers within 100 miles of Centerfield, UT. To see more or to contact these members, click here to create a free account.

Centerfield, Utah Swingers can be found on Swingular. It's easy to find others using our advanced search technology. We base our search by zipcode so you will see how far each member is away from you by miles. You can search locally or you can search by state or zipcode as well. We have thousands of members from Centerfield, Utah so you have a very good chance that you will meet someone to your liking. We also have a booty call feature so you can post a booty call for quick response. Create your free account today and begin hooking up with Centerfield Swingers right away!

The New Neighbors Are Swingers - - So clever. My neighbors growing up had all these. My young self had no idea.

swingin - thought this site was a swingers site -

Moab Utah - Swingers in Moab - We go to Moab all the time! Would be great to meet up with another couple down there. :-)

Game ON....which sign is Hornier...(is that a word?) - zodiac signs of swingers? - Tony - Scorpio Karen - Cancer

Who is going to Younge swingers week HEDO? - anyone going? - From what I have heard Hedo is the most SM friendly resort, does anyone else know of any others? I am planning on having about a month between jobs this year and want to do some traveling.

Adult Vacation Recomendations - We need some help what to do or where to go! - [quote=WYSEXY]We went to a takeover in Vegas at the Rumor that was an absolute Blast...four full nights of Debauchery!!![/quote] That would be fun.. how often do they do those? Takeover is definitely the key... don't try to mix the swingers vacation with the vanilla's. =)

Too Many Fake People Here - Nobody really wants to fuck! - [quote=HAOPENGYOU]Before we moved to the coast 3 years ago, we were pretty active in the Utah lifestyle, and it definitely seemed more active and vibrant than it does now, at least insofar as we can judge from activity on this website. Back then we would regularly do things with the same three couples, all of whom we met on Swingular, and we notice now that two of their profiles are no longer here on this site. So you might be right, although we hope not, because we had a blast with this in Utah. When we did make the move out of Utah, we switched to another website, as Swingular is strongly Utah-centric. In fact, we've never had a single communication on Swingular from anywhere at all outside of Utah. Hey, if things get too sparse, come meet us in Portland, which apparently is the [url=https://www.prunderground.com/swingery-publishes-top-10-cities-with-the-most-swingers-in-the-us/00102465/]#1 swinger city in the country[/url]. We had no idea about that when we moved to Oregon, but we're not complaining. Go to Privata downtown if you ever have the chance. And if you ever tell anyone that you're not interested in a physical relationship with them, and they lose it (happened to us one time), then they're no one you wanted to hang with anyway. You'll do well to be rid of them. If any of you ever make it to the coast, you're invited to sip wine with us and watch whales from our deck. Best of luck to you. And Happy New Year.[/quote] Our point originally was that perhaps these people aren't really as fake, as they are private. I think the scene here is actually still doing quite well! It's just changing. In our case, we're just not as "out there" anymore as we used to be....And kind of feel like maybe that's true for a lot of folks. And maybe it's our age...we are 10 years older now...and not exactly in high demand. That said...we just may have to do a bit of whale watching in Portland, someday.....

pop quizze guys - you take 3 weeks to know a couple - I don't care about Poets writing skills. It's not a problem for me even though I will admit I really still don't follow what happened. That could be me and my inability to understand. The dude that didn't stop, what he was doing, to whoever he was doing it to, I have a big problem with. Anything less than a bold and unequivocal understanding that no means no and stop means stop makes the two of us uneasy, because there is way too much at stake. It's NOT a subject open to discussion or vague interpretation. The initial question about waiting three weeks and getting the green light and then being asked to stop, posed as just that, a hypothetical question, in and of itself, will illicit some direct and emotional response. No means no is pretty cut and dry for a lot of swingers. Poet never said he didn't stop, nor did he say he didn't think he shouldn't stop, he asked a question. Once it came to light, that someone, actually didn't stop, and continued on with a living breathing woman it becomes a subject that makes most everyone that is a wife or loves their wife or frankly is a woman or respects women uneasy and in my case angry, and guarded, and protective. Not yelling at Poet, which I haven't, my response to the question, and to whatever actually happened, which I am not following, is still and will remain emotionally charged. I will own that. I must admit that we both would just avoid any person or group we are not absolutely sure understands, wholeheartedly accepts, and behaves in accordance with [b]no means no and stop means stop[/b].

Have Diapers...will travel. - Funny, not so funny...the Love Triangle from Space. - I just want to know how the things she had packed up (along with the pepper spray) were going to be used - this was one smart USAF/NASA trained lady so she had to have some great plan to make use of it all. If she would have only been a swinger the triangle thing would have been much less of a problem :-) Swingers In Space ". . . .or would you like swing on a star . . . ." Max

Obama's Roadtrip - - [quote]Fair enough. Then why rely on them for anything that likely wasn't adequately studied?[/quote] Likely just does not do it for me...When the numbers are given AND shown how they were gathered, I tend to believe they are fairly accurate. [quote]Let's take your Pepsi/Coke example. There is likely nothing befuddling about your scenario. Just one possibility: Where are the two Florida products bottled? Maybe it's the water.[/quote] Both bottled locally, it is chalked up to being a preferance thing. In WI, lived there for a while, it was called pop or soda, unless a VERY specific thing was needed, a Mountain Dew for instance. In the south, it is a Coke no matter what it is. If someone in the south offers a Coke, it could be Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Diet Rite, Sam's Club Soda, etc. [quote]I'm glad you agree with the logic. My Bachelor's is in Social Welfare (Psych Minor). Human nature is only a bitch of a thing when you get out there a few standard deviations. The bulk of us are as predictable as rats.[/quote] Believe it or not, I have 2 BA's (econ and int. rel.) with a minor in social work. So I am very aware of social science standards and SOME believe that we're predictable. If you have a smaller sample, we are fairly predictable, especially when the sample is taken from a specific group of people (swingers for instance, better yet, swingers in a specific region), once you get to the larger populations (nationwide for instance), human behavior is not easily quantified. Try being the ONLY conservative in all the social work classes, it was fun! Then again, opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. [quote]I propose that as an economist you are simply looking at things with a limited perspective. [/quote] Possibly, but I also have a rare ability to look at it from an outsider's view.... [quote]There is simply no question that if a person's basic needs (food and shelter) are met, there is less motivation to risk the consequences of violating societal rules.[/quote] I can see the logic of this, however, we are Americans, we always want MORE, we are constantly bombarded with images of MORE, we are constantly told that without MORE we are incomplete, etc. What are the consequences of violating societal rules? Food, shelter, clothing, TV, etc? Really tough there. Look at prisons in Mexico, if your family does not provide, you starve, more than likely. THAT is consequences, it is a deterrant (sp?). IMHO, one of the reasons for our increased crime rates is the lack of public punishment. If every time you turned around, you saw a group of people in black and white stripes mowing lawns, trimming trees, etc. on the side of the road in leg chains, it would cut crime considerably. If they did public executions, it would cut crime dramatically. Then again, I am a staunch supporter of heavy penalties for crimes, especially when they are repeat offenders, most of the social scientists are not. They want more rehab and such, which I also support, BUT only for first timers, not for repeat offenders. Anyway, I am thoroughly enjoying our debate... Next!