Holbrook Swingers in Pennsylvania

If you are looking for Swingers in Holbrook, PA, then Swingular is the place for you. We have hundreds of thousands of swingers all over Holbrook looking to meet new people. Here is a list of 16 random Swingers within 100 miles of Holbrook, PA. To see more or to contact these members, click here to create a free account.

Holbrook, Pennsylvania Swingers can be found on Swingular. It's easy to find others using our advanced search technology. We base our search by zipcode so you will see how far each member is away from you by miles. You can search locally or you can search by state or zipcode as well. We have thousands of members from Holbrook, Pennsylvania so you have a very good chance that you will meet someone to your liking. We also have a booty call feature so you can post a booty call for quick response. Create your free account today and begin hooking up with Holbrook Swingers right away!

Site Weirdness - A thousand less members online than usual? - [quote=CHEFFETTE]There's typically 1600-2000 members online when I login at any given time; but there's less than 600 online today. The layout appears to have changed slightly as well, (Log Out button moved for example) though no functionality updates I can find. Has there been a swinger apocalypse? A Rapture in which more swingers were caught up than one would cynically imagine?[/quote] The number of people online before was total B.S... Basically, if you signed in, it "counted you" as being online for the next several days (even if you clicked the sign-out button). It looks like the admin has tweaked that number down a little to make it more accurate. =)

PICTURE SURFERS HANG A 180 LOL - - Here is one for ya......Has every one been seeing those ads , on swinger sites mind you, that say "We are looking for friends MAYBE more". Did they forget what site they were on. This isn't the place to be "wishy washy". If your here you need to be serious and not waisting serious swingers time. If your saying MAYBE you should take a little more time and be very sure that this is for you. Does anyone agree?

Swing Color Bands - Swing Color Bands - I agree the wristbands are a good idea but Having so many colors is ridiculous and confusing as this site is proving. What is everyone going to have to carry a cheat card in their pockets to remind them of what colors what. Why not stay to the basic's: One color which just signifies you are swingers and can be worn outside the club these also can have a universal Logo of choice. Have Two clors which shows Female is BI, multicolored, and Third, tri-colored, which shows Both are Bi. That's One band with NO more then 3 colors which u can wear anywear and maybe meet new people u wouldn't have been able to do before. Again, keep it simple and less confusing.

Anybody a member of New Horizons Swingers Club in Seattle? - - We need a sponsor for the party this weekend.

Cuckolding - Interesting article from some outsiders, what do yo - - [quote=EVILDOERS]I read the article and from a swinging standpoint don't consider encouraging and enjoying my wife's enjoyment of her sexuality as anything even approaching cuckoldry. I'm sure some vanillas might see it differently thru the lenses of their "vanilla goggles" but swinging is definitely NOT cuckoldry. The sad thing is that (yes, I have to go there) some single men view coupled male swingers as nothing more than cucks and often act accordingly and thus perpetuate the dreaded SM stigma. Don't get me wrong. There definitely are cucks in the lifestyle and to some the "hotwife" style of play approaches if not at times reaches the level of cuckoldry. But the vast majority of male swingers are definitely not cucks and simply enjoy the fact that their partners are free to explore their sexuality and "get off", if you will, on the fact that their partner is turned on and experiencing their sexual desires to the fullest. [/quote] We agree. There is some really bad behavior that is not "swinging" in the minds of the two of us that is being solicited online in "lifestyle" sites such as Swingular. As an example, Saturday night we had a married man in the chat room, whose whole profile is a declaration that he is bored with his wife and looking to cheat on her hit on us. When we told him no thanks with an explanation, giving him more credit than he deserved, he suggested that we had a problem. We think it is really disrespectful for a man such as this guy to suggest or request or whatever he wants to call it that we would be party to his deception in any way shape or form. That is cheating and not swinging. We had a similar request with a similar response from another married man that said he had his wife's permission a week earlier. We are explicit in explaining why these men are barking up the wrong tree in our profile content. We would expect to be treated better by some shyster car-sales-man selling and misrepresenting run down used jalopies than we get from some limp and boring males that have the audacity to suggest we would even want to know someone of such low character let alone even consider including anything to do with sexual intimacy. That is just not the proper decorum for a respectable swinger. Perhaps we are just too conservative in how we view the time honored tradition of "swinging." Well Evil old chap, we are off to bed for a frolic. Must be up early to attend to the hounds. Cheerio.

Seems Pointless - Seems Pointless - [quote=Defiantstranger]“Because it’s a swinger site” - doesn’t explain the WHY the site would have any user (single male, or otherwise), be able to view users that they could not contact. Wouldn’t it make more sense to have your profile NOT pop up on searches from singles males or any other demographic that does not interest you? “not designed for single males” As you said earlier, it’s a swinger site…. It can be assumed that is “designed” for all types of swingers… couples, single males, single females, all types. The category’s are pretty clear in its stated format. I do agree however that many seemingly just troll.[/quote] We disagree on the definition of what a swinger is. I don’t consider singles to be swingers. Maybe try the apps 3Fun or Feeld. They’re geared towards 3somes

Swingers cars??? - What ya driving?? - lets see wife has a 2006 dodge suv big 3 row seating dvd plays midnite blue color mine 1998 dodge truck king cad. riding on 35s seliver two tune. 4x4

Swingers Kickball Society - - We are I n Salt Lake Co

Mormons - -

PICTUREDICK,

Before you do what a lot of individuals do on this site and make presumptuous comments, get to know the history of the website a little. The site was called something else when it started in FL. Rob, the founder of "Swingular" seperated from the co-founder of the original site. He moved to Utah and began marketing it here. That is why it is more prevelant in the two states. Polygamy in the local history has nothing to do with the amount of swingers on this site. It has everything to do with localized marketing efforts. The only people involved in polygamy in Utah are now mainly extreme minority offshoots of the LDS religion, like the FLDS or "Fundementalist Latter Day Saints" Church. They are shunned by the mainstream LDS church. They are the very reason many people today, still attach the word "polygamy" with mormons. I too, once presumed such things about them. After living amongst the mainstream members, I was quickly educated. I wasn't slamming you, it's just that we have a lot of individuals here that would rather presume or assume than take the time to research. It's kinda like people thinking most Texans are ignorant racist rednecks. While there will always be those that are true to the stereotype, it hardly means we should make such presumptions about the majority, when visiting. Hell they still hold KKK rallies in the south. There are lots of pitchforks and torches on swingular LOL!
-Don-

Original humans as swingers? - Provocative theories based on Bonobo sexual behavior - [quote=LOGANLOVERS]I'm happy evolution took away our hair and did a lot of other cool stuff to us, but it's too bad we couldn't have latched onto that method of conflict resoultion.[/quote] If you read the article in the link above the video, the author postulates that 10,000 years ago a shift in our way of life (agricultural revolution) also shifted the sexual paradigm. And that is why that method of conflict resolution was abandoned, not because of evolutionary pressures, but because of social pressures. Being that it only occurred 10,000 years ago that is why the basic instinct has not changed, and why humans still seek sexual variety, even multiple partners. That theory is so radically different from most other evolution theories it is akin to Copernicus suggesting that the earth was not the center of the universe. History and science have proven Copernicus right, what about this theory?