Bridgeport Swingers in Nebraska

If you are looking for Swingers in Bridgeport, NE, then Swingular is the place for you. We have hundreds of thousands of swingers all over Bridgeport looking to meet new people. Here is a list of 16 random Swingers within 100 miles of Bridgeport, NE. To see more or to contact these members, click here to create a free account.

Bridgeport, Nebraska Swingers can be found on Swingular. It's easy to find others using our advanced search technology. We base our search by zipcode so you will see how far each member is away from you by miles. You can search locally or you can search by state or zipcode as well. We have thousands of members from Bridgeport, Nebraska so you have a very good chance that you will meet someone to your liking. We also have a booty call feature so you can post a booty call for quick response. Create your free account today and begin hooking up with Bridgeport Swingers right away!

flintstones swingers ? yes or no - - Omg I saw a funny email one day that had those 4 in an orgy...on my phone or I'd find it and post it...was funny as hell!

Kik group for UT swingers. - Contact me if your interested in joining a KIK group for Swingers - maven2014 Enough said. LOL Mav

swingin - thought this site was a swingers site - WAAAAA, get over it, its a forum.. if you dont like it, dont read it

Why swingers are happier. - - That just spoke of sex, not swinging

40i-ish couples - - We are also in that group! We are a little north of the mecca of sexy swingers! Lets make northern Utah fun!!!!

Is it a “preference” or is it “ discrimination” - - [quote=DANDTCURIOUS][quote=EVILDOERS]Discrimination can be against non-physical attributes as well (Political and religious are the two most obvious nowadays.) But I would call almost everything else a preference, at least as far as swinging is concerned. One of the biggest hurdles we found when we first entered the lifestyle was people who were upset that, for whatever reason, we didn't want to fuck them. Their mindset was, "We're swingers and you're swingers so what's the problem? Let's fuck!" We did, eventually, come to the realization that in some instances our first impression, based on looks or whatever, could be overcome, in time, by getting to know people better and eventually finding a different kind of attractiveness that trumped simple physical attraction. YMMV[/quote] Oh of course discrimination can be against non-physical ... my question was can a non-physical attribute be just a preference and not be discrimination .. it sounds like you think so ... other than maybe with political or religious? Hmmm so let’s say someone keenly despises Trump, or Bernie (not that anyone does lol) .... like really can’t stand them. And someone crazy hot that LOVEs Trump, like wears a red MAGA hat loves, wants to hook up ... Could the political disposition “preference” still be only a preference, and not discrimination, if it gets in the way of any possible sexual attraction ?[/quote] Holy shit! You mean it messes me up when I wear my MAGA hat in sexual situations (Though I prefer a more discriminatory MAGA hat "Make Adam God Again" The Mormon Vatican peeps will understand that one)? I thought everyone got turned on by Trump. Ask him... He will tell you. He is the best at ______. 🤣 i freaking loved your example by the way, hilarious and good point. Great example, totally got the visual! 🤣🤣🤣

Are swingers moral? - Who determines what morals are? - I was raised to believe that morality and the law are the same thing. People, in LDS society anyway, seem to profess that being moral is obeying the law and that is what they teach their children in church. I have always assumed that other religions do the same thing. But what seems to be said here is that swingers feel that the law has little or nothing to do with morality and that we are perfectly willing to break the law for our own pleasure. Is that what we are saying here.

What's the universal swinger signal? - How can you spot a swinger?? - With my ex, we 'recruited' a lot of people into the lifestyle. We simply flirted and saw where it went. If they're in the lifestyle, they'll know what is happening, if they're not but open, they'll figure it out pretty quickly, if they're not and not open to it, flirting with a couple isn't a good thing, they'll walk away. Locally, there's a nudist resort, not all nudists are swingers and not all swingers are nudists, so to find out, simply talk, drop a hint, etc. that's all we did.

Original humans as swingers? - Provocative theories based on Bonobo sexual behavior - The author of the CNN article has co-written a book "[i]Sex at dawn: The Prehistoric Origins of Modern Sexuality[/i]" Have not read it yet, but will soon. It is interesting to see that the bonobos engage in sexual practices such as oral sex, anal sex, gay sex, and group sex, as a matter of course. Could this be the way early humans practiced their sexuality? What about pair bonding? If memory serves, from what has been observed in Emperor Penguins, they pair bond for as long as it takes to raise a chick to self-sufficiency. If the egg does not hatch, or the chick dies before then, the bond is dissolved and the two find new mates for the next season, just as when the chick is able to care for itself. Could this be the way early humans pair bonded? Would this explain the "seven year itch"? Or as Dr. Ryan says," An individual male's "parental investment," in other words, tends to be diffuse in societies like those in which we evolved, not directed toward one particular woman -- or harem of women -- and her children, as conventional views of our sexual evolution insist." Could it be that both pair bonding, and communal parenting were practiced? It seems that some societies did in fact practice some form of sexual conflict resolution, while others practiced conflict of arms. Was that an evolutional turning point? Just some questions to ponder.... Myself, I came to the conclusion that the concept of marriage as we have it originated with the agriculture , as at that time it became important to know that your possessions were going to be inherited by your offspring, independent of reading any scholarly works on the subject. So the idea that early humans lived communally and had sex communally doesn't seem too far fetched.

Fuck pod - What’s your fantasy? - The vaccines so far have proven effective against all variants. Nothing is 100% but statistics suggest getting vaccinated adds a higher level of protection against becoming seriously ill. You are statistically less likely to transmit the virus to others. That’s not just the case with this virus and all the variants, it’s true with vaccine rollouts that dramatically reduced other serious illnesses, like polio. Polio still exist. You just don’t see it at the levels that existed before the vaccine developed to fight it. Same can be said for small pox. So, the question posed in the thread is “ If you were to join a fuck pod, what would you want the people and the pods activities to be?”. For some people vaccinated fuck pod members to add protection against this pandemic, and tested to verify that that the members don’t carry an STD is part of what the people in the pod to want the pod to include. You are a nudist not a swinger so a fuck pod really isn’t relevant. Granted nudist have standards and not all nudist are going to agree about what those standards should be. As for pro vaccination swingers. We are getting emails from some really intelligent and sexy couples and singles that would be interested in a STD tested and vaccinated Fuck Pod. No, we aren’t currently members of a pod like that, but yes, it sure looks like at first glance it’s possible that a pod or pods could form.