If you are looking
for Swingers in Mount Rainier, MD, then Swingular is the place for you. We
have hundreds of thousands of swingers all over Mount Rainier looking to meet new people.
Here is a list of 16 random Swingers within 100 miles of Mount Rainier, MD. To
see more or to contact these members, click here to
create a free account.
Mount Rainier, Maryland Swingers can be found on Swingular. It's easy to find others
using our advanced search technology. We base our search by zipcode so you will see how
far each member is away from you by miles. You can search locally or you can search by
state or zipcode as well. We have thousands of members from Mount Rainier, Maryland so
you have a very good chance that you will meet someone to your liking. We also have a
booty call feature so you can post a booty call for quick response. Create your free
account today and begin hooking up with Mount Rainier Swingers right away!
Why so much hate in the swingers world... - - AKLIM,
It's just as "rude" for you not to click "ignore single males". If you expect them all to read your profile, you take the time to read your settings thoroughly enough to see that you can block them LOL!
raw statistics can be flawed. You show me stats that say today in LA, 1000 pitbulls attacked children and only 400 were committed by other various breeds. What does that tell you/me??? It says nothing of the circumstance. Were the animals mistreated and trained to attack??? How many pits are trained to fight???? Show me your stats. Stats can be skewed to fit the bias. Show me some.
In reality, the CDC lists 10 that are prone to bite:
Pit bulls
Rottweilers
German Shepherds
Huskies
Alaskan Malamutes
Doberman Pinschers
Chow Chows
Great Danes
St. Bernards
Akitas
Wow, all large breeds that are usually trained to fight, guard or attack.
-D-
-D-
where are the real people who want to swing - run into to many phonies - where the hell are all the real swingers at out there and how come it is so hard to find them
and where are the real down to earth ones who are not ken and barbie and looking for real people at.
Moab Utah - Swingers in Moab - [quote=Utahldscouple]We are game for booking a LS group trip![/quote]
We'd be interested in a trip to Moab.
What do you say? - I gasped in horror! - You know what, I posted this thread thinking we could all talk about how good we have it because we are in healthy sexual relationships, not why its selfish to want oral (come on give me a break, like being swingers isn't already selfish.).
You people (and you know who you are) are whacked! its just a discussion on how bad it would suck to be this girl, not how holier than thou the fucking majority of the people in this site are, but once again you all proved that it doesn't matter what anyone says, you are all anti-fun.
Thanks for ruining another fun thread. PLEASE do us all a favor, and pull the sticks from your asses. Enjoy your miserable fucking lives, cause I'm happy giving and receiving oral sex.
Now I'm off to enjoy head, jealous much?
Party Pics... - Pictures of Swingers Parties etc... - Check this Party trick with the next picture..
I’m defense of single males - Funny old geezers - [quote=DELICIOUSLYWET][quote=PARTYINLV]We are in our sixth year on this site. We are also currently on three more sites, even after dropping two more. When we joined Swingular, we were taken aback from the negativity toward single guys. We did not see this this level of animosity on any other of the sites we are or were on.
Aside from the folks from Idaho and Wyoming (and very, very few nationwide), this site is predominately Utah based. I am not negatively judging Utah since a survey or research was never done, but we had to wonder if this hatred is a Utah thing. Or was it a few couples who made it seem normal to hate and everyone just jumped on the bandwagon? Human history has taught us that ostracizing is easier than accepting. Who knows? We certainly don't understand it.
Many couples correctly point out that single guys are not [b]"swingers"[/b] since they don't swap. But, we believe that single guys are part of the [b]"lifestyle"[/b] for many couples. Why is fmf ok, but mfm is not ok?
As a side note: The vast majority of our play is with couples(our preference). But we occasionally like mfm for the different dynamics it offers. We have been very lucky with mfm and haven't had a bad experience yet, which I cannot say is always true with every couple we've met.[/quote]
We live here. Our experience is that most couples do not hate single men. Most married men are not intimidated by the presence of single men. Most couples and singles whether super active or rarely active in the lifestyle don’t post anything in the forum section of this website. As is the case with so much on the internet, a few of us that do read or post in the forums, may give others the impression that we are a good general representation of the community’s mindset. Obviously we aren’t. What we read here is mostly just personal preferences. There are some thoughts expressed that we find interesting, sometimes enlightening. Sometimes people are just venting. Sometimes it’s angry venting stemming from personal experience. As for insecurities, we all have at least a few.[/quote]
Perhaps I am just mistaking the complaints I see in forums on the home page as a reflection of the general attitude here
Younger couples - How hard is it for younger couples - [quote=BR3RD]Who wouldn’t be attracted to younger couples? It’s usually the younger couples who are not attracted to the older ones.[/quote]
True that! If a young couple feels some frustration now, just wait until they reach our age. It will be even more frustrating. But hang in there young swingers. Your best days are still ahead of you.
Kik group for UT swingers. - Contact me if your interested in joining a KIK group for Swingers - [quote=URNEWSECRET]Tried to send you more details but your not accepting messages lol[/quote]
They probably are, just not from SMs
Just curious are we the only ones? - Just curious are we the only ones? - [quote=BMSHELL]
Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that there are 3,000 couples in Utah who are actively interested in swinging. (Again, I have SERIOUS doubts that the number is that high, based on data I've collected from Swingular... but let's roll with it)... There are 886,000 couples in Utah, which means there's a 0.33% chance (1 in 300) that the couple you're looking at are swingers.
However, if the number of ACTIVE swinging couples in Utah is closer to 1,000 (far more likely), the odds go down to 0.11% (1 in 1,000). This is probably a more realistic picture of your odds when you try to pick up a random couple in the wild.
[/quote]
A caveat of this analysis is that it assumes a uniform distribution of swingers over the population of Utah. My guess is that this isn't the case but instead the density of swingers aligns with the density of more liberal thinkers. The net result is that it would put more swingers in the more densely populated areas with the highest density in SLC. That could easily swing the odds from 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 100. At least for those of us in SLC. For the poor suckers not SLC it could go the other way. :) That said, yes, I feel lucky enough to gamble basically nothing on 1 in 1,000 odds. ;)
Game ON....which sign is Hornier...(is that a word?) - zodiac signs of swingers? - Gemini here
|
