Swingular

Pennville Swingers in Indiana

Pennville Swingers

If you are looking for Swingers in Pennville, IN, then Swingular is the place for you. We have hundreds of thousands of swingers all over Pennville looking to meet new people. Here is a list of 16 random Swingers within 100 miles of Pennville, IN. To see more or to contact these members, click here to create a free account.

Pennville Threesomes Pennville Menage A Trois Pennville Group Sex Pennville Foursomes Pennville Bi-Female Pennville BBW Pennville Gang Bang Pennville MMF Pennville MFM Pennville Personals Pennville Ads Pennville Photos Pennville Girl on Girl Pennville Nudists Pennville Exhibitionists Pennville Voyeurs Pennville Exhibitionists Pennville Voyeurs

Pennville, Indiana Swingers can be found on Swingular. It's easy to find others using our advanced search technology. We base our search by zipcode so you will see how far each member is away from you by miles. You can search locally or you can search by state or zipcode as well. We have thousands of members from Pennville, Indiana so you have a very good chance that you will meet someone to your liking. We also have a booty call feature so you can post a booty call for quick response. Create your free account today and begin hooking up with Pennville Swingers right away!

Has anyone thought of a swingers-biker group - - Has anyone thought of starting, or does anyone know of a swingers group for bikers, for instance i plan on going to sturgis this year, are there any couples who want to team up and ride with/ or meet up there. there are so many bikers in the gulf coast and so many swingers, you'd think we could set up a group for runs and such. I know there are swinger poker runs and stuff like that, I was thinking more of an actual regular group. What do you guys think? Rayna & Scott

Crockett county Playmates - Looking for some bi curious couples and females - My swing partner and I need someone to play with, she can't handle me all night by herself. Where are all my other swingers in hiding? Discretion is guaranteed, just hit us up. Tj2damax91 Yahoo

Taking the time... - - I have actually turned down invitations from VERY experienced swingers mindful and concerned about being fully able to play my part in accordance with what I imagine their standards might be and/or probably are. I would prefer, still, to play with less experienced people and learn the ropes, so to speak. One of my interests in pursuing this at all is to learn more about sexuality ... others' as well as my own.

Toy Recommendations - If you had to choose just one... - Since we dont know much about toys we would have to improvise and make some wild and crazy toys from all the things that are around us. Could be fun to do this on day.......Get a bunch of swingers and do a cross between Survivor, the Amazing race, and that business one with Donald Trump......HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

april 2011 swingers cruise - - We're doing our CruisErotica Pre-Cruise stowaway night again for the April cruise too. We'll have the rooms at the Hampton Inn in Ybor city same as usual. Just give us a shout. cheers Char & Jim Char Travel.com

Arranging Gangbang - - Here is our take on what may not be a gang bang but something akin to one. Mrs. Delicious has been the only woman with three men, including myself, a few times. If all the men have stamina and can recover quickly three men is enough. Three men can go on for hours. It's not that hard to screen two additional men, if the husband is involved. A lot of swingers know and trust at least three single men with bedroom skills and polite and charming personalities. If you don't know any such men, they are out there. It's a plus if these fellows know each other too. If everyone in the room is comfortable together, then performance issues disappear, and the shared nature of the experience is magnified. In our opinion three men, who a lady can know well enough to trust, becomes more intimate, while remaining extremely erotic, and is preferable to more men, she doesn't know at all, that may or may not be a positive experience. Easier to set up, and no regrets!

People Who Try Too Hard - - Whoever could you mean??? LOL http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/forum http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/conversationalist If there is an ongoing debate in the forum (it's usually called a discussion... The very point of a forum), then wouldn't you agree that the likelihood of someone involved in a conversation, posting more than one time, is pretty damn good? Ask yourselves, how many one sentence or one statement conversations have you had in life? People who enjoy or seek this in forums are called "conversationalists". It's not wrong to get to know others. That is, after all, the reason we are all here. The poster puts their view out and the reader can decide whether they agree, disagree or desire to further discuss or elaborate on their side. It's like a dance of the minds. Some like the waltz, some like salsa, while others like a Mosh Pit. Just because you don't mosh doesn't mean that you should attempt to deny others of enjoying it. Tolerance is what I am getting at. I am a self-proclaimed asshole, but I still have the right to express myself. I have differing views from lots of people here. That's what I find to be beautiful about people. We are all unique in some form or another. It's uncovering those uniquities, I find to be the "buried treasures" among the vast diversity of people that post here. It's a small window into their being. You don't always like what you see, but it's still there no matter how much you complain. It's like those who had DJQ kicked off of here. I hated his views and all for which he stood, but in the end all he was guilty of was written expression of his view. Many wanted his head to roll and had him removed. Why? Because he didn't agree. Hell, he attacked my very service to this country. I hated his views. However, I still think he had the right to speak his heart. Admittedly, The forum became slightly less exciting after he left. The majority who read the forum remember what a prick he was, but they do remember him. He contributed to the conversation, no matter how skewed we felt his leftist position to be. I'll close my post with this... We are swingers... Don't you think people would disagree with our lifestyle choices, our views on marriage and the morale implications (if you are religious)? Furthermore, doesn't it all come down to personal choice. Just like you have the choice not to read this very post. :-) Just my thoughts, nothing more. Respectfully, -Mr TR- P.S. I whole-heartedly invite you to tell me to fuck off for my differing view. :-)

Webchat - a question - Wow. Poet, thanks for your invigorating post. I found it both thought provoking and alarming. Quick hint though - Spell check. Type your post in Word or something before you post it. As for the webcam part of this - good Lord, can't we all just have fun? Since when do swingers follow rules? The webcam chat is supposed to be fun, isn't it? I view it much more like a large hot tub - clothing is optional, however there should never be any pressure to do anything else (from me, anyway). I will always offer my window to a lady while I'm in the room, because it's polite. It has nothing to do with who is going to show what, who is going to fuck whom - it has to do with basic decency. Is it really that hard to understand? Guys, be gentlemen and offer up your space. Guys, don't be dicks, and don't pressure the ladies into doing something they don't wanna do. There. if you can't understand that, go back to Canada. Mr. Coupleinsoutahcounty

Obama's Roadtrip - - [quote]Fair enough. Then why rely on them for anything that likely wasn't adequately studied?[/quote] Likely just does not do it for me...When the numbers are given AND shown how they were gathered, I tend to believe they are fairly accurate. [quote]Let's take your Pepsi/Coke example. There is likely nothing befuddling about your scenario. Just one possibility: Where are the two Florida products bottled? Maybe it's the water.[/quote] Both bottled locally, it is chalked up to being a preferance thing. In WI, lived there for a while, it was called pop or soda, unless a VERY specific thing was needed, a Mountain Dew for instance. In the south, it is a Coke no matter what it is. If someone in the south offers a Coke, it could be Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Diet Rite, Sam's Club Soda, etc. [quote]I'm glad you agree with the logic. My Bachelor's is in Social Welfare (Psych Minor). Human nature is only a bitch of a thing when you get out there a few standard deviations. The bulk of us are as predictable as rats.[/quote] Believe it or not, I have 2 BA's (econ and int. rel.) with a minor in social work. So I am very aware of social science standards and SOME believe that we're predictable. If you have a smaller sample, we are fairly predictable, especially when the sample is taken from a specific group of people (swingers for instance, better yet, swingers in a specific region), once you get to the larger populations (nationwide for instance), human behavior is not easily quantified. Try being the ONLY conservative in all the social work classes, it was fun! Then again, opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. [quote]I propose that as an economist you are simply looking at things with a limited perspective. [/quote] Possibly, but I also have a rare ability to look at it from an outsider's view.... [quote]There is simply no question that if a person's basic needs (food and shelter) are met, there is less motivation to risk the consequences of violating societal rules.[/quote] I can see the logic of this, however, we are Americans, we always want MORE, we are constantly bombarded with images of MORE, we are constantly told that without MORE we are incomplete, etc. What are the consequences of violating societal rules? Food, shelter, clothing, TV, etc? Really tough there. Look at prisons in Mexico, if your family does not provide, you starve, more than likely. THAT is consequences, it is a deterrant (sp?). IMHO, one of the reasons for our increased crime rates is the lack of public punishment. If every time you turned around, you saw a group of people in black and white stripes mowing lawns, trimming trees, etc. on the side of the road in leg chains, it would cut crime considerably. If they did public executions, it would cut crime dramatically. Then again, I am a staunch supporter of heavy penalties for crimes, especially when they are repeat offenders, most of the social scientists are not. They want more rehab and such, which I also support, BUT only for first timers, not for repeat offenders. Anyway, I am thoroughly enjoying our debate... Next!

Maybe we'll have to default to wearing those black rings. - - The porn ban/block/opt-in is incredibly infeasible. Look at Reddit for example, there are TONS and TONS of subreddits (communities in a sense) that have porn. (reddit.com/r/swingers, reddit.com/r/swingersGW, reddit.com/r/nsfw, reddit.com/r/straightgirlsplaying...) It would take a tremendous amount of manpower in the state of Utah (as the ISPs will not do this) to label websites as "porn". Most exclusively porn sites (tubegalore, pornhub) are likely already labeled that, but again the reddits and tumblrs of the internet would take forever to filter out. Now, about the opt-in list being held with the ISPs. They already know every single customer who looks at porn. Unless you use a good VPN, they are well aware of every website you visit. That being said, while they might not have a list of people that look at porn, it would be really easy for a hacker to, once they get into the ISP, gather information about everyone who looks at porn and share it with the world. If they couldn't get into the ISP, they could still get this information from porn websites. Unfortunately for the Utah government, this plan is just not possible and is basically just BS to get support for reelections...

© Copyright 2001–2019 Swingular, an SB Entertainment Company.