for ( Breeding Parties = non Condom ) and ( Gang Bangs = Condom Required ) the female is more protected than the males.
I'll give translating this a shot - if a woman gets pregnant she has more legal protections than the non-pregnant person, namely a male.
Am I close? Is the pinata at least spinning from a glancing blow?
Am I close? Is the pinata at least spinning from a glancing blow?
If the female calls foul after the get together, guys can still get in trouble for consensual sex sexual assault in Utah unless there is a contract of full Consent signed between all parties involved.
Sounds like a job for Siegfried & Jensen. We don't get paid unless YOU do. 
POET_RAYL wrote:
If the female calls foul after the get together, guys can still get in trouble for consensual sex sexual assault in Utah unless there is a contract of full Consent signed between all parties involved.
If the issues of implied consent, withdrawn consent and ignored consent in the context of a woman having sex w/ multiple men at one time is what dominates your mindset, (and from your posting history these last few weeks it certainly appears to) maybe you're hanging out w/ a group that's not for you. Or for non-rapists, it sounds like.
"Or for non-rapists, it sounds like."
Oh no you DI-UN'T!
Oh no you DI-UN'T!
EVILDOERS wrote:
"Or for non-rapists, it sounds like."
Oh no you DI-UN'T!
Oh yes she did and who can blame her? Blocking protects quarterbacks in the super bowl, and the women we love in the lifestyle. How many offensive fouls should a player get before they get thrown out of the game?
Oh yes she did! And thank you for doing so!
GOINGOURWAY wrote:
Oh yes she did! And thank you for doing so!
You're welcome. No one could really accuse me of being a prude and frankly GB is something I fantasize about. But I don't like Poet's gangety-bangety, 'Let's see how many dicks we can fit in this hole like co-eds in a telephone booth just b/c we can try!' friends, it sounds like these fellows are doing their best to find a way to rape in a context where they have a built-in out or can at least spread the blame around and confuse the issue.
You know - assholes. The assholes who make it harder for all men, but especially single men who aren't inclined to rape to get welcomed to a non-rape event.
PS, they should ALL be non-rape events.
By my understanding if a female in a group set doesn't want anal and anal is preformed than that is with out full consent of the female, and the guys can still get in trouble for doing it.
The issue of consensual sex is often only brought up when there is some sort of doubt about whether all people engaging in sex want it to happen. However, consent is a topic that should be discussed whenever you're thinking about a possible sexual encounter with multiple partners at once.
Thing people should think about
The issue of consensual sex is often only brought up when there is some sort of doubt about whether all people engaging in sex want it to happen. However, consent is a topic that should be discussed whenever you're thinking about a possible sexual encounter with multiple partners at once.
Thing people should think about
POET_RAYL wrote:
By my understanding if a female in a group set doesn't want anal and anal is preformed than that is with out full consent of the female, and the guys can still get in trouble for doing it.
The issue of consensual sex is often only brought up when there is some sort of doubt about whether all people engaging in sex want it to happen. However, consent is a topic that should be discussed whenever you're thinking about a possible sexual encounter with multiple partners at once.
Thing people should think about
Yes, if a guy performs RAPE the guy can still get in trouble for RAPE. It isn't 'anal sex with less than full consent', it is FUCKING RAPE POET. The only person who posts in these threads who doesn't seem to consistently get that point is you. There is no such thing as non-consensual sex, ok? There's consensual sex and there's RAPE. Regardless of the number of partners in a setting.
BTW, when you copy/paste form other sources w/o citing them it's plagiarism. If anyone's interested, here are at least two of the links Poet's quoted form in his last post. http://www.pamf.org/teen/abc/sex/consent.html
http://www.useditem.org/consensual-sex-and-alcohol-5764610/
That is thing people should think about
If I didn't know bots had better editing software, I'd think Poet was a trolling program.
CHEFFETTE wrote:
[quote=POET_RAYL]By my understanding if a female in a group set doesn't want anal and anal is preformed than that is with out full consent of the female, and the guys can still get in trouble for doing it.
The issue of consensual sex is often only brought up when there is some sort of doubt about whether all people engaging in sex want it to happen. However, consent is a topic that should be discussed whenever you're thinking about a possible sexual encounter with multiple partners at once.
Thing people should think about
Yes, if a guy performs RAPE the guy can still get in trouble for RAPE. It isn't 'anal sex with less than full consent', it is FUCKING RAPE POET. The only person who posts in these threads who doesn't seem to consistently get that point is you. There is no such thing as non-consensual sex, ok? There's consensual sex and there's RAPE. Regardless of the number of partners in a setting.
This ^^^^^^^^!
Well I'm just attempting to understand and you guys enjoy calling me names and accusing me of things
Since if I interrupt you happy flow Of your forums that I'm A bad person. So in joy your forums of BS and Enjoy you fucked up lives of being one of the prity people in the world of Utah
Since if I interrupt you happy flow Of your forums that I'm A bad person. So in joy your forums of BS and Enjoy you fucked up lives of being one of the prity people in the world of Utah
But it's not rape if you yell, "Surprise!" first, right? Right? 
I feel prity...oh so prity....
Dude, ya gotta understand when you say something SO wrong people are gonna call you on it. Maybe it's all a communication problem or maybe it's actually your mindset but there is a big disconnect of some kind going on here.
I feel prity...oh so prity....
Dude, ya gotta understand when you say something SO wrong people are gonna call you on it. Maybe it's all a communication problem or maybe it's actually your mindset but there is a big disconnect of some kind going on here.
POET_RAYL wrote:
Well I'm just attempting to understand and you guys enjoy calling me names and accusing me of things
Since if I interrupt you happy flow Of your forums that I'm A bad person. So in joy your forums of BS and Enjoy you fucked up lives of being one of the prity people in the world of Utah
I'm not going to be sorry that you A) don't feel that you're pretty in the world of Utah or B) that I will reiterate as often as I need to what is and is not rape. Other people can massage your ego as they like but you don't get to play the moody teenager w/ me and get away w/ reassuring hugs and a warm cookie.
I find it highly unlikely you don't understand consent and rape and the lack of gray areas in between at your age and level of life experience.
Have never seen you as misunderstood. You are a disgusting moron. Self inflicted in your case. I can only take solace in the fact that I don't see any rational female that would let herself ever let herself get that close to you. Again I pity your wife and find it repulsive talking of other wives or gfs showing no respect for your wife. Prity or pretty I won't say. Mentally and spiritually you are morally bankrupt. Just go away.