Swingular

Mountain City Swingers in Georgia

Mountain City Swingers

If you are looking for Swingers in Mountain City, GA, then Swingular is the place for you. We have hundreds of thousands of swingers all over Mountain City looking to meet new people. Here is a list of 16 random Swingers within 100 miles of Mountain City, GA. To see more or to contact these members, click here to create a free account.

Mountain City Threesomes Mountain City Menage A Trois Mountain City Group Sex Mountain City Foursomes Mountain City Bi-Female Mountain City BBW Mountain City Gang Bang Mountain City MMF Mountain City MFM Mountain City Personals Mountain City Ads Mountain City Photos Mountain City Girl on Girl Mountain City Nudists Mountain City Exhibitionists Mountain City Voyeurs Mountain City Exhibitionists Mountain City Voyeurs

Mountain City, Georgia Swingers can be found on Swingular. It's easy to find others using our advanced search technology. We base our search by zipcode so you will see how far each member is away from you by miles. You can search locally or you can search by state or zipcode as well. We have thousands of members from Mountain City, Georgia so you have a very good chance that you will meet someone to your liking. We also have a booty call feature so you can post a booty call for quick response. Create your free account today and begin hooking up with Mountain City Swingers right away!

I am Getting Fed Up With The Way This Site Doesn't Work - - Best thing about swinger sites is guess what "swingers" this is about meeting like minded people. Get over the techy glitches, get out there and F(*& someone. I promise you will feel better.

Is HABITS still the place to go? - - Habits: Pros: Great music, food delish, cool/friendly staff. Cons: Drinks pricey/watered down, music too loud, "dress code", popular hangout with self proclaimed elite swingers. Club 48: Pros: Drinks great, music at reasonable level, relaxed atmosphere. Cons: Food sucks, understaffed, sometimes music sucks too. Northern Exposure: Pros: Private room with private smoking area, some drinks good, music at reasonable level, music ok. Cons: Some drinks pricey/watered down and they seem to run out of their "specials" quickly, food sucks too, staff really busy (altho they are friendly).

What's in Southern Utah? - - no that just sucks for you my wife has the problem of turning strait people into swingers LOL

Can\'t seem to get it going. - What to do? - I\'m going to go a little deaper than the responces I have seen so far. First thing, you said that you have been divorced TWICE. That is not deadly in itself, but some personal examination of why is a good thing. For the most part, swingers are not looking for problems or \"bagage\" just fun social and sexual things with folks. I guess what I am suggesting is that you need to be straight out in getting your house in order and yes as others have suggested, a well filled out profile and pics are in order. Some couples like to add a single male, Some couple like to add a single female... but swinging in general is a couples game. Recognize the fact that you are a way over supply of single males that most couples will find you if they have any disire to add a single male. At this point you really do need to be someone that is desirable to that couple. Do your best and hope for the best. Fill out your profile, post a few pics, ( not just cock shots, everyone knows that you have one) Be nice, be personable, be someone that others would enjoy being with and that includes social things as well. OK, TJ off the soap box (TJ = the janitor just cleaning up the place)

The unbearable burden of proof. - Congratulations! You have an opinion. Why does everybody else have to agree with it? - Well, this certainly seems like a 'diverted extension' to me. But, since you did ask (and publicly), here goes: People often tell others what they've done, to demonstrate that they have a certain amount of experience doing it. Simple enough. And, in remarkable contrast to your opinion, it's not necessarily to sound intelligent or to give credence to an outrageous postulations. Sometimes they actually know what they're talking about. Unfortunately, you can't assume that just because someone talks about their experience, they really don't know anything. As to your comment concerning years of experience...(and you immediately zero in on computers...hmmm...wonder what that's about?) 1. As T4REAL capably put it, the kid from college has 'book smarts', but often lacks the real-world experience to make that training useful. Give me the vet every time - and if you listen, you'll find many who will echo that. Probably a majority. Why? Because the vet's not only seen more real problems, but they've been involved in more real answers. I recall a quote along the lines of "The biggest fault of youth is inexperience". While the young grad *cannot* have the benefit of experience the vet does, it *is* possible the vet can have the experience and the (recent) academic exposure, as well. 2. My mom - an educator herself, with degrees in all sorts of stuff, told me once, "I went to college to learn what I didn't know". (Little play on words, there - she was a languistics teacher). What she meant was that, beyond high school is another type of learning - broad and still detailed. You really begin to realize how little you actually know about things when you're exposed to further education. You gain an advanced perspective, which in turn makes you realize you know diddly, in the grand scheme of things. (Happy Mother's Day, Mom) 3. "Any more than 5 years of doing something allows a person sufficient enough time to become calcified into a single-mindedness that allows the world to pass you by anonymously." Nice pile of words...but, sure - it does 'allow...sufficient time' - but, again, it doesn't guarantee anything. If a person does anything for *any* length of time, and doesn't work to keep current, they will fall behind what is current. But you have little way of knowing how current people are, just based on some post on an Internet swingers site. Five years of doing something doesn't automatically mean someone's fallen behind, either. And the 62.5% of all statistics you cite? Well, doesn't that mean 37.5% are completely legit? (No matter the fictitious percentage *you* make your point with, it's complement will always oppose you). Again, trouble here is you have no way of knowing whether a given citation is accurate or not - but you can't just assume they're all wrong. Again, as in our recent discussion elsewhere - I put my opinion out there, and I have no problem letting others read and decide for themselves. Some people (*ahem*) seem so interested in contradicting others, they get far, far away from the matter at hand. You may find it interesting to know, I'm not really formally educated much beyond high school and military technical training; I hold no degrees, and very few certifications, proper. What I know about PC's I've learned almost entirely on my own. To be honest, I'd prefer a guy who learned because he really had passion enough to learn on his own. This is one reason I have so many machines at home...it's a hobby, but it's also a huge test bed; a training apparatus. And I've been training for over 25 years (sorry, I'm sure you hate me saying that). On the other hand, with no more education and certificates than I have, I did actually run a reasonably successful business for a while. I've managed to support my family at a level *well* beyond the means you'd expect from my education alone. So, it's possible that I do know what I'm talking about, although I don't expect you'll ever acknowledge that. It's OK, I don't really require your acknowledgement. I do realize I'm making a few assumptions here myself. While this isn't necessarily about me, it damn sure smacks of it; not at all subtle of you. Still, I've tried to indulge you, without attacking you or being insulting. I hope you learn what there is to know from the responses to your post. And T4real - excellent points!

Habits - - I would love for this community to find a new place to meet up. Habits is too loud to talk if you desire to. The drinks are very watered down. They charge a ludicrous sum for Designated driver drinks and more and more the people in attendance there fall into undesirable categories. It seems most of the swingers we talk to wish there was a better place to go but end up going there by default. Can't we as a group take our business to somewhere more inviting, accommodating and fun? We have a few places in mind but are unsure how to get the group to "swing" over there.

CALLING ALL FOOTBALL FANATICS - - I am starting a fantasy league for swingers. This league is for the die hard fantasy football fan. There are some rules. 1. You must display your email address. So other owners may contact you about trades. 2. You must reply to all trade inquiries within 1-3 days. (whether to accept or decline). 3. You can only have one team in this league. 4. No lopsided trades will be allowed. (Meaning: If one owner is gaining way more than the other. The league will veto it. 5. If you are not a fanatic and will not follow your team please don't join this league. 6. If you do not agree with the any of the above rules, please don't join this league. All the rules will be implemented. These rules are in place for a fair and fun season. Again this is for the die hard fantasy football fan. You can find the league on yahoo. Here are the league settings: League ID#: 150145 League Name: Swingers Football League Password: takemywife Draft Type: Live Draft Draft Time: Sat Aug 21 9:45pm CDT Max Teams: 14 Scoring Type: Head-to-Head Start Scoring on: Week 1 Can't Cut List Provider: Yahoo! Sports Max Moves: No maximum Max Trades: No maximum Trade Reject Time: 2 Trade End Date: November 19, 2004 Trade Review: League Votes Waiver Time: 2 days Post Draft Players: Follow Waiver Rules Playoffs: Week 15, 16 and 17 (8 teams) Roster Positions: QB, WR, WR, WR, RB, RB, TE, WR/TE, K, DB, DB, DL, DL, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN Stat Categories: Passing Yards (30 yards per point) Passing Touchdowns = 6 Interceptions (-2) Rushing Yards (10 yards per point) Rushing Touchdowns = 6 Reception Yards (15 yards per point) Reception Touchdowns = 6 Return Touchdowns = 6 2-Point Conversions (2) Fumbles Lost (-2) Offensive Fumble Return TD = 6 Field Goals 0-19 Yards (3) Field Goals 20-29 Yards (3) Field Goals 30-39 Yards (3) Field Goals 40-49 Yards (4) Field Goals 50+ Yards (5) Point After Attempt Made (1) Tackle Solo (1.5) Tackle Assist (.5) Sack (3) Interception (4) Fumble Force (2) Fumble Recovery (2) Touchdown = 6 Safety (2) Pass Defended (1) Block Kick (2) Fractional Points: No Negative Points: Yes

Swingers in the Mountains - - Is there really a swinger's convention in Alta right now???

NUDIST RESORT - what are the do's and dont's ? - If you take a southern route and find yourselves in AZ, Mira Vista in Tucson is a very nice resort. Bear in mind it is for nudists, and overt swingers are not welcome. Low-key crowd and wide range of ages. Sunscreen is a must! Safe travels!

The definition of cheating - - Interesting discussion. Certainly from a relationship standpoint the classic definition of cheating is being with someone other than your partner physically and/or emotionally. As swingers, however, we often hold ourselves above others and fall back on the lying and/or sneaking around aspect. Personally I feel that being dishonest with the person you hold most dear in this life to be the essence of cheating for me. When information is withheld you take away that person's prerogative to choose whether or not to stay in the relationship with you based on your actions outside of the relationship. There are a million ways people rationalize cheating. I find that a person's attitude towards cheating is a very good litmus test for the depth of their character. Now should we talk about cheating on a test or cheating other people out of their hard earned money? How about cheating on your taxes or at a poker game with friends? At what point DOES cheating become morally reprehensible or should it be "all's fair in love and war" and "every man (or woman) for himself"? Or as SIRNEWBY asserts, is self deception/lying/cheating really the only valid metric? Or did I misunderstand your point, SN? It would be interesting to get feedback from people (I'm sure there are plenty) who've been cheated on.

© Copyright 2001–2019 Swingular, an SB Entertainment Company.