Ash Flat Swingers in Arkansas

If you are looking for Swingers in Ash Flat, AR, then Swingular is the place for you. We have hundreds of thousands of swingers all over Ash Flat looking to meet new people. Here is a list of 16 random Swingers within 100 miles of Ash Flat, AR. To see more or to contact these members, click here to create a free account.

Ash Flat, Arkansas Swingers can be found on Swingular. It's easy to find others using our advanced search technology. We base our search by zipcode so you will see how far each member is away from you by miles. You can search locally or you can search by state or zipcode as well. We have thousands of members from Ash Flat, Arkansas so you have a very good chance that you will meet someone to your liking. We also have a booty call feature so you can post a booty call for quick response. Create your free account today and begin hooking up with Ash Flat Swingers right away!

Where we focus our attention - Chill out Scully! The sex is out there! - [quote=SKICOUPLE]You take a great point of view about swingers and their attitude towards others. Of course most swingers would not discuss politics or religion when attempting to create a sexy adventure with others. I mean why create a situation for disagreement...nothing sexy in that. Perhaps swingers are more respectful of others as they would wish to be treated that way also. We have wonderful swinger friends that we disagree with politically yet it never seems to dampen our interactions. There are circumstances where anger can add something to a sexual encounter but not often. Maybe revenge sex (very nice indeed), make up sex or break up sex can turn an angry situation into a sexy situation but not often. Its all about attitude and what you hope to accomplish, for us its fun and happy swinging adventures. No disaggreement or contention just respectful people looking for some fun.[/quote] I think that perhaps there in a tendency for some people to try and belong, by adopting the prejudices, that might be voiced by the people they are trying to get acceptance from. People who may be a bit less stable emotionally might take that to extremes. Happens in politics and maybe it happens just a bit within the lifestyle community. If the in group that they want to belong to does not prefer a certain type of appearance, gender preference, sexual preference, whatever, they will go out of their way to insult and sort of persecute those sorts of people to try and find favor within their target group. We have gone to meet and greets, where we have been approached by people, who rather than just honestly letting us know they were interested, they spent more time telling us what losers their perception of the majority of the other attendees were and how we were more like them and not like the rest of the crowd. They point out some commonality we might seem to share with them. We don't attend a meet and greet to develop a sense of superiority or inflate our or their egos. We let them know we are very much like the crowd in many ways. When we are really in the moment and really connecting with anyone or anything, do we think in terms of our ego? Or do sublime moments remove us from the burden of ego? Ego can make wall flowers of any of us, if it overrides our curiosity, humanity and sense of adventure. Maybe sex can be such a sublime healing event that all those differences and all the self labeling that seem so important get reframed. Do we see realty more clearly in the afterglow?

New Swingers Club in Utah - Gauging interest in new club - I wish there was a club in southeast Idaho.

What is up with Utah?! - Swingers in Utah and nowhere else? - you know what they say about people in Utah.........lol k & a

Just in case it mysteriously disappears - - A cut and paste from another forum "Posted By: GOODSKICOUPLE Posted on: Oct 24, 2007 - 5:16 pm Update for the Swingular Membership: Excuse the long post. Good Evening Swingers, NTAKTAGF legal counsel has informed us today that no communication has been heard from Swingular management by 1400 EST, Wednesday, Oct 24, 2007. Sadly, the speech of a few Swingular members (and some suspected computer shenanigans), as well as the support of that speech by Swingular management has changed Swingular forever. The innocuous place on the internet that Swingular has enjoyed since its inception is now altered. The authorities are being notified. If the legal action by the State of Florida materializes, it will have to be documented in every annual report that the parent company files. These reports are public documents available to anyone that desires to examine them. This will likely hinder the ability of Swingular to obtain capital, since such jeopardy must be disclosed. It remains to be seen if the possibility of investigation by the Florida Secretary of State, the Florida U.S. Attorney, or the Internet Task Group will affect the numbers of current members that wish to remain or the inflow of new subscribers. Today VanCott, Bagley, Cornwall and McCarthy began the process to officially request assistance from the Florida Secretary of State. This will take a little time. The gears of large institutions turn slowly . To give the members an idea how serious this matter is, VBCM will encourage the Florida General Counsel to pierce the corporate veil. If successful, the executive officers of the company will be held PERSONALY liable for the conduct of the members that decided it would be good business to take the company on its present course. It will be dark times if this occurs. In a sense, without the knowledge of the membership or maybe even management, the ship has been pointed toward the rocks by a mere handful of people. If you are curious about these things, VBCM confidently predicted that no communication would be heard from Swingular management. They simply waited, sharpening their tools until they could be used. While we believe this matter can still be resolved, we are positive that some of it is now irrevocable. How much further it goes, is now up to the general membership and the management. We encourage management to give VBCM a call. 2 hours ago preliminary official correspondence departed Utah via overnight courier to Lynn Hearn, Florida Secretary of State, Chief General Counsel. "

Mormons - - [quote=Utahldscouple]We are probably one of the few “real” ones on here. It’s hard to be one in this lifestyle especially here in Utah. Those that are in the lifestyle have issues with “Mormons”. We get judged by both those in and those not. [/quote] For the record, I would NEVER judge anyone for being Mormon and in the lifestyle. Been there, done that and know PLENTY of others who have as well. *edit: I should clarify that I meant WE were technically Mormons...but inactive, when we started swinging and we've met MANY active and inactive Mormons who were swingers over the years* LOL But I WOULD have a bit of an issue if you showed up to play with your garments on. But I guarantee that there are also plenty of people who would probably get off on it if you did. [em]Emo_49[/em]

Amusing - Fakes.. ugh.. DESPISE THEM! - Ya, we've had this problem a number of times... but...what makes you So sure it's NOt the girl from the website you mentioned?...are celebrities not allowed to be swingers? just food for thought

Breaking the 4th wall - meeting a swinger in a vanilla situation. - [quote=FUN4MWF]Rather than jump on the bandwagon and agree with everyone all teenie-bopper style, I'd need more info. Did you articulate in your email EXACTLY who you are, as in your real name and job and how you knew them and the specific circumstances that allowed you to recognize them?[/quote] Basically my e-mail was: "Hi, I'm James, the male half of Blueidkat, I work as a sales rep for a national beverage company and consequently call on a lot of retail locations along the Wasatch Front. The other day I was at Blah business in Blah City and noticed someone who looks a lot like you. I know with all the swingers in Utah I must bump into some, everyday, and not realize it. It was so cool to possibly recognize a lifestyler out there in the vanilla world and just wondered if I was right." I understand the whole fear of being stalked and the need for anonimity but are we that afraid? Do we need to be?

New Years Party (1/2 In Pocatello) - Let's celebrate 2015 and welcome 2016!! - Well, it is that time of year for us all to look back on the year that is just about over and reflect upon it as it has been an interesting year for our group of sexy friends. It is also time to look ahead to 2016 in the hopes that it will be an even better year for us all. So come on out and join us for a chance to get together some of our sexy friends and welcome in the New Year together. This party will be on Saturday, January 2nd in the Jasper Room at the Clarion Inn in Pocatello starting at 8:00 pm. We will have full bar service and some hors d'oeuvres available. In addition to that we have reserved 2, 2-room king suites for those who wish to break away from the party and have some sexy fun. Due to the nature of this party and the arrangements we have made, there will be a cost for admission. Tickets are $25 for a couple and $15 for single males and or females. Due to the size of the room we have rented for this party, there will be a limited number of tickets available (30 couples tickets and 15 singles tickets). Tickets are available for purchase online at Ticket Leap (http://idaho-swingers-r-us.ticketleap.com/2016-new-years-party). We hope to see you there for a good time!

asking your swinger friend if you can join them. - - [quote=EVILDOERS]"I am not in the lifestyle and don't think I ever really fully would be" "K USSIR your not a swinger but you wanna have sex with you friends wife with your friend there? HMMMMMMM I smell a swinger in the making" Naw, I smell a single guy who just wants to get laid. If you aren't really interested in swinging just leave it alone and get your jollies elsewhere. There are plenty of ways for you to get your rocks off in bars and clubs and on Craigslist. It's your VERY common SM attitude that makes it tough for the very few single guys who get it and really want to be part of the lifestyle. No wonder so many people constantly say that singles aren't really swingers. But don't worry. You aren't alone. We've met TONS of single dudes over the years who've admitted that they would NEVER allow their wife (if they ever got married) to fuck another man. Swinging is an attitude and a mindset. A guy who would let you fuck his wife is risking a lot and sharing with you the most important thing in his life. If you can't grasp that concept you should just stay home and jerk it to online porn.[/quote] I had not thought about it like that. I guess I was thinking that if he would consider asking a "friend" to consider allowing him to have sex with his wife that he would at least consider letting his friend have sex with his wife too were he married. If he wouldn't then that makes him a bit unilateral in his approach and really his co-worker should recognize early on that they are being used for carnal considerations that fall somewhere in opposition with this fellows own code of ethics. If he means that he cannot see himself as a swinger as in he is not looking to find a mate that would be swing friendly, or feels he can attract or maybe even afford a mate that would be swing friendly or maybe even find a mate at all then that is a bit different. I am not ready to light the torches we like to light and carry as we chase away and banish a single male from our world just yet. USSIR, If that be the case, that you want to bang his wife, but you would never allow yours to be banged, think again and treat your co-worker and his wife like a friend and an equal rather than a hedonistic opportunity to exploit. Asking him to allow you to do something that you are frankly apposed to and then doing it will most probably reduce your own self esteem as well and it should. If your intentions are respectful toward all parties involved then that is different.

swingers defined - - [quote=JUST_RACH]LOL this was posted up a while ago. [/quote] Sorry about that. I'm new here. I didn't realize that I was dredging up things from the past.